辽宁师范大学学报:社会科学版
遼寧師範大學學報:社會科學版
료녕사범대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition)
2015年
1期
34~38
,共null页
司法鉴定 地方性法规 立法现状 上位法与下位法
司法鑒定 地方性法規 立法現狀 上位法與下位法
사법감정 지방성법규 입법현상 상위법여하위법
judicial identification;local regulations;present legislation;mian laws and subordinate laws
2005年2月28日,全国人大常委会通过的《关于司法鉴定管理问题的决定》(以下简称《决定》),系指引和规制我国司法鉴定事项的纲领性法律文件。与此同时,我国部分省、市、自治区、直辖市人大常委会从1999年年初至今已颁发15部司法鉴定条例和1部司法鉴定条例草案。就司法鉴定这一相同主题,国家立法和大量地方立法并存,上位法与下位法之间的关系及其实践适用值得探讨。基于现有立法,在形式上分析立法结构,在内容上把上位法的《决定》与下位法的条例法律文本从鉴定主体、管理权设置、鉴定程序、鉴定范围和法律责任等进行解构对比发现,尽管作为上位法的《决定》对下位法的条例规制作用非常显著,但现有的条例类下位法对上位法的《决定》亦时有突破,制定我国统一的司法鉴定法势在必行。
2005年2月28日,全國人大常委會通過的《關于司法鑒定管理問題的決定》(以下簡稱《決定》),繫指引和規製我國司法鑒定事項的綱領性法律文件。與此同時,我國部分省、市、自治區、直轄市人大常委會從1999年年初至今已頒髮15部司法鑒定條例和1部司法鑒定條例草案。就司法鑒定這一相同主題,國傢立法和大量地方立法併存,上位法與下位法之間的關繫及其實踐適用值得探討。基于現有立法,在形式上分析立法結構,在內容上把上位法的《決定》與下位法的條例法律文本從鑒定主體、管理權設置、鑒定程序、鑒定範圍和法律責任等進行解構對比髮現,儘管作為上位法的《決定》對下位法的條例規製作用非常顯著,但現有的條例類下位法對上位法的《決定》亦時有突破,製定我國統一的司法鑒定法勢在必行。
2005년2월28일,전국인대상위회통과적《관우사법감정관리문제적결정》(이하간칭《결정》),계지인화규제아국사법감정사항적강령성법률문건。여차동시,아국부분성、시、자치구、직할시인대상위회종1999년년초지금이반발15부사법감정조례화1부사법감정조례초안。취사법감정저일상동주제,국가입법화대량지방입법병존,상위법여하위법지간적관계급기실천괄용치득탐토。기우현유입법,재형식상분석입법결구,재내용상파상위법적《결정》여하위법적조례법률문본종감정주체、관리권설치、감정정서、감정범위화법률책임등진행해구대비발현,진관작위상위법적《결정》대하위법적조례규제작용비상현저,단현유적조례류하위법대상위법적《결정》역시유돌파,제정아국통일적사법감정법세재필행。
"The Decision of Judicial Expertise Administration" passed by the NPC standing committee on February 28, 2005, is programmatic document for Chinese Judicial expertise. Meanwhile, 15 regulations and 1 draft regulation of judicial expertise have been released by the local NPC standing committee since 1990. Therefore, in terms of judicial expertise, the national legislature (the superior law )as well as a number of local legislatures (the subordinate laws) are always considered. So the study of the relationship between them is necessary. On the basis of the existing legislation, we can analyze their legislative structures and contrast their contents from different aspects, such as, the appraisal of main body and control set, appraisal procedure, appraisal scope and legal liability of deconstruction. From the study, we find that the "Decision" (the superior law) regulate the subordinate laws apparently, but the subordinate laws always breakthrough the "Decision". So how to formulate unified judicial identification method is imperative in our country.