CAJ | 학술논문

埃伦·伍德批评20世纪70年代后西方新左翼在理论上日渐背离经典马克思主义,其中以普兰查斯、拉克劳与墨菲、后现代主义最为典型。在她看来,普兰查斯过分抬高了意识形态与政治的重要性,其理论中存在诸多矛盾与混乱,并具有很大的危害;而拉克劳与墨菲的理论中存在诸多对马克思和马克思主义的误读,其“激进民主”方案也缺乏可靠的社会根基,政治策略本质上是一种改良主义;后现代主义的产生有其特定的历史根源,其理论逻辑混乱,政治主张亦具有很大的迷惑性并可能导致严重后果。伍德批判的出发点在于捍卫经典马克思主义的思想地位,其中贯穿着马克思主义思维方法,但在有些问题上批判过于笼统,分寸上也不是很适当。
애륜·오덕비평20세기70년대후서방신좌익재이론상일점배리경전마극사주의,기중이보란사사、랍극로여묵비、후현대주의최위전형。재저간래,보란사사과분태고료의식형태여정치적중요성,기이론중존재제다모순여혼란,병구유흔대적위해;이랍극로여묵비적이론중존재제다대마극사화마극사주의적오독,기“격진민주”방안야결핍가고적사회근기,정치책략본질상시일충개량주의;후현대주의적산생유기특정적역사근원,기이론라집혼란,정치주장역구유흔대적미혹성병가능도치엄중후과。오덕비판적출발점재우한위경전마극사주의적사상지위,기중관천착마극사주의사유방법,단재유사문제상비판과우롱통,분촌상야불시흔괄당。
Ellen Meiksins Wood criticizes that the western New Left gradually deviate from classical marxism in theory after 1970s among whom Nicos Poulantzas, Laclau/Mouffe and Postmodernism are typical. In her opinion, Poulantzas raises the importance of ideology and politics too much and there are many mistakes and chaos in his theory which has a great deal of harm. She insists that there is a lot of misunderstanding in Laclau and Mouffe~ theory, that its ＂ Radical Democracy＂ scheme is lack of reliable social foun- dation and its political strategy is essentially a kind of reformism. In addition, Wood analyses the specific historical roots of the Post- modernism, reveals its logical chaos in theory and indicates its politics is confusing which may have serious consequences. The start- ing point of Wood＇s criticism is guarding classical marxism, and the thinking method of it is marxist, but it is inappropriate in some other aspects, such as discretion.