CAJ | 학술논문

当下对于“五四宪法”历史地位的定位和描述混淆不清。通过对“五四宪法”和《中国人民政治协商会议共同纲领》的文本的比较分析,研究“五四宪法”的性质及其历史地位,认为“五四宪法”的制定和颁布不是制宪而是修宪,其历史地位不是“新中国第一部宪法”,而应当是“中国第一部社会主义（性质的）宪法”。
당하대우“오사헌법”역사지위적정위화묘술혼효불청。통과대“오사헌법”화《중국인민정치협상회의공동강령》적문본적비교분석,연구“오사헌법”적성질급기역사지위,인위“오사헌법”적제정화반포불시제헌이시수헌,기역사지위불시“신중국제일부헌법”,이응당시“중국제일부사회주의（성질적）헌법”。
Based on the analysis of the text of 1954 Constitution and the Common Program of the Chinese People＇s Political Consultative Conference,this study which is concerned with the historical status of 1954 Consti- tution manifests that 1954 Constitution was just a constitutional amendment,and its historical status should be considered as the first socialistic constitution in China rather than the first constitution in P. R. China.