系统工程理论与实践
繫統工程理論與實踐
계통공정이론여실천
Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice
2015年
1期
160~167
,共null页
沈强儒 杨少伟 赵一飞 曹慧
瀋彊儒 楊少偉 趙一飛 曹慧
침강유 양소위 조일비 조혜
高速公路 互通式立交 间距 冲突率 安全
高速公路 互通式立交 間距 遲突率 安全
고속공로 호통식입교 간거 충돌솔 안전
freeway; interchange; spacing; conflict rate; safety
以新建小间距互通式立交区域主线范围内的交通状况为研究对象,运用交通冲突技术理论及VISSIM交通流微观仿真技术获取小间距互通式立交冲突率和间距关系模型,以小间距互通式立交区域的冲突率作为安全评价指标,运用灰色聚类理论,提出小间距互通式立交区域交通安全评价方法,把不同立交间距对应的安全等级分为四种类:不安全(D级),临界安全(C级),较安全(B级),安全(A级),对两个互通式立交间距小于700m的情况,应提出相应交通安全改善措施.应用结果表明:不同间距安全等级不相同,通过采用改善措施提高小间距互通式立交区域的安全状况,同时为新建小间距互通式立交区域安全评价提供有效途径.
以新建小間距互通式立交區域主線範圍內的交通狀況為研究對象,運用交通遲突技術理論及VISSIM交通流微觀倣真技術穫取小間距互通式立交遲突率和間距關繫模型,以小間距互通式立交區域的遲突率作為安全評價指標,運用灰色聚類理論,提齣小間距互通式立交區域交通安全評價方法,把不同立交間距對應的安全等級分為四種類:不安全(D級),臨界安全(C級),較安全(B級),安全(A級),對兩箇互通式立交間距小于700m的情況,應提齣相應交通安全改善措施.應用結果錶明:不同間距安全等級不相同,通過採用改善措施提高小間距互通式立交區域的安全狀況,同時為新建小間距互通式立交區域安全評價提供有效途徑.
이신건소간거호통식입교구역주선범위내적교통상황위연구대상,운용교통충돌기술이론급VISSIM교통류미관방진기술획취소간거호통식입교충돌솔화간거관계모형,이소간거호통식입교구역적충돌솔작위안전평개지표,운용회색취류이론,제출소간거호통식입교구역교통안전평개방법,파불동입교간거대응적안전등급분위사충류:불안전(D급),림계안전(C급),교안전(B급),안전(A급),대량개호통식입교간거소우700m적정황,응제출상응교통안전개선조시.응용결과표명:불동간거안전등급불상동,통과채용개선조시제고소간거호통식입교구역적안전상황,동시위신건소간거호통식입교구역안전평개제공유효도경.
Taking the traffic situation in the area of new small spacing interchange as a research object, it used traffic conflict technique and VISSIM traffic flow simulation technique to establish traffic conflict simulation and to obtain the small spacing interchange collision rate and spacing relational model; conflict ratio was taken as the safety assessment index in the small spacing interchange by means of gray cluster theory. According to the level of security in the small spacing interchange area, the paper divides into four types by the diffident spacing: unsafe (D-level), criticality safety (C-level), safer (B-level), security (A-level), and the two interchange spacing of less than 700m should be put forward corresponding measures to improve the traffic safety. Application results show that: Interchange of different spacing is not the same level of security, the use of improved measures can improve the safety situation of small spacing interchange area. At the same time, it provides effective safety evaluation of interchange for the new small spacing area.