CAJ | 학술논문

2014年5月22日，欧盟海豹产品案发布上诉报告。该报告第一次在WTO框架下阐释了动物福利措施与公共道德例外的关系。一方面，肯定了欧盟保护与海豹福利相关的公共道德目标的正当性；另一方面，又认为欧盟措施的具体实施方式构成了武断的、不公正的歧视，从而最终否定了欧盟措施的正当性。WTO试图在一成员保护动物福利的权利与其他成员在GATT1994协议的自由贸易权利之间维持平衡。动物福利措施既有其合理的方面，同时又可能成为新型的贸易壁垒，动物福利与自由贸易之间冲突的最终解决需要国内法与国际法的协调。
2014년5월22일，구맹해표산품안발포상소보고。해보고제일차재WTO광가하천석료동물복리조시여공공도덕예외적관계。일방면，긍정료구맹보호여해표복리상관적공공도덕목표적정당성；령일방면，우인위구맹조시적구체실시방식구성료무단적、불공정적기시，종이최종부정료구맹조시적정당성。WTO시도재일성원보호동물복리적권리여기타성원재GATT1994협의적자유무역권리지간유지평형。동물복리조시기유기합리적방면，동시우가능성위신형적무역벽루，동물복리여자유무역지간충돌적최종해결수요국내법여국제법적협조。
On 22 May 2014, the Appellate Body report of EC-Seal Products was circulated to Members, it was the first time that WTO explained the relationship between the animal welfare and the exception of public morals. On the one hand, the Appellate Body report affirmed the legitimacy of the protection of the public moral concerns on seal welfare, on the other hand, it considered the EU Seal Regime was applied in a manner which would constitute a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination, so it negated the legitimacy of the EU measure at last. WTO try to keep the balance between one members right of regulation on a non-trade value and other members right of free trade. The measures of animal welfare have legitimate aspects, meanwhile it also may be a trade between the animal welfare and free and national law barrier. To solve trade, it need the the problem of the conflict coordination international law