河北法学
河北法學
하북법학
Hebei Law Science
2015年
2期
191~200
,共null页
行政诉权 特别权力关系 行政诉讼受案范围 原告资格:法经济学
行政訴權 特彆權力關繫 行政訴訟受案範圍 原告資格:法經濟學
행정소권 특별권력관계 행정소송수안범위 원고자격:법경제학
administrative litigation right ; special power relationship ; the scope of administrativelitigation; plaintiff qualification: Law and Economics
对行政诉权的保护是衡量一个国家行政法治水平的重要尺度。如果行政相对人或相关人的诉权得不到救济和保障,行政诉权不能顺畅进入“法律之门”,仅从司法体制和司法程序构筑上着手,这样的努力显然是徒劳的。在我国目前的宪政条件下,受国外“特别权力关系理论”及中国传统文化、现实司法体制多重影响的行政诉权,应以行政诉讼受案范围扩大的增量改革为突破口,寻求规模效益递增,并逐步培育出法治力量,最终推进行政诉讼司法体制的存量改革。行政诉权的发展必将为政府公权和社会公众私权博弈提供明确的行为预期,也为司法权监督行政权开启“法律之门”,激励各方由对抗走向合作。
對行政訴權的保護是衡量一箇國傢行政法治水平的重要呎度。如果行政相對人或相關人的訴權得不到救濟和保障,行政訴權不能順暢進入“法律之門”,僅從司法體製和司法程序構築上著手,這樣的努力顯然是徒勞的。在我國目前的憲政條件下,受國外“特彆權力關繫理論”及中國傳統文化、現實司法體製多重影響的行政訴權,應以行政訴訟受案範圍擴大的增量改革為突破口,尋求規模效益遞增,併逐步培育齣法治力量,最終推進行政訴訟司法體製的存量改革。行政訴權的髮展必將為政府公權和社會公衆私權博弈提供明確的行為預期,也為司法權鑑督行政權開啟“法律之門”,激勵各方由對抗走嚮閤作。
대행정소권적보호시형량일개국가행정법치수평적중요척도。여과행정상대인혹상관인적소권득불도구제화보장,행정소권불능순창진입“법률지문”,부종사법체제화사법정서구축상착수,저양적노력현연시도로적。재아국목전적헌정조건하,수국외“특별권력관계이론”급중국전통문화、현실사법체제다중영향적행정소권,응이행정소송수안범위확대적증량개혁위돌파구,심구규모효익체증,병축보배육출법치역량,최종추진행정소송사법체제적존량개혁。행정소권적발전필장위정부공권화사회공음사권박혁제공명학적행위예기,야위사법권감독행정권개계“법률지문”,격려각방유대항주향합작。
The protection of administrative litigation is important measure of a country level of administrative law. If the administrative relative person or relevant person's litigious right can not get relief and security, can not flow into the gateway to the law of administrative litigation, the judicial system and judicial process to construct just begin, such efforts apparently in vain. The present conditions, the constitutional government m our country by torelgn "" special power relahon theory and the influence of Chinese traditional culture, the reality of the judicial system multiple administrative litigation, should be to expand scope of accepting cases of administrative litigation of incremental reform as the breakthrough point, seeking increasing economies of scale, and gradually developed power under the rule of law, promote the reform of administrative litigation in the inventory of the judicial system in the end. Administrative litigation will be for the government to the development of public rights and private rights game offers a clear public behavior expectations, as well as jurisdiction to supervise administrative power to open the door of the "law", insoire the narties from confrontation to coperation.