经济社会体制比较
經濟社會體製比較
경제사회체제비교
Comparative Economic and Social Systems
2015年
1期
139~151
,共null页
差别电价政策 产业效率 倾向得分匹配
差彆電價政策 產業效率 傾嚮得分匹配
차별전개정책 산업효솔 경향득분필배
Differential Electricity Price Policy; Industrial Productivity; Propensity Score Matching
差别电价政策作为节能减排政策在高耗能工业行业上的实践,为环境规制和企业活动关系的研究提供了“拟自然实验”的机会。文章利用非参数的研究方法,将倍差法和倾向得分匹配法相结合,研究了差别电价政策如何通过增加企业成本和改变产业效率,最终影响微观企业的工业增加值、工业总产值、工资和利润等经济活动变量。利用2003~2007年相关规制行业企业的微观数据,实证发现差别电价政策在整体上对相关行业有不利影响。在控制劳动力和资本变化的前提下,政策累计造成工业总产值约8%,工业增加值约9%,工资约25%,利润约99%的负面影响。该实证结果表明差别电价政策在相应时间段内对技术进步有负面影响。
差彆電價政策作為節能減排政策在高耗能工業行業上的實踐,為環境規製和企業活動關繫的研究提供瞭“擬自然實驗”的機會。文章利用非參數的研究方法,將倍差法和傾嚮得分匹配法相結閤,研究瞭差彆電價政策如何通過增加企業成本和改變產業效率,最終影響微觀企業的工業增加值、工業總產值、工資和利潤等經濟活動變量。利用2003~2007年相關規製行業企業的微觀數據,實證髮現差彆電價政策在整體上對相關行業有不利影響。在控製勞動力和資本變化的前提下,政策纍計造成工業總產值約8%,工業增加值約9%,工資約25%,利潤約99%的負麵影響。該實證結果錶明差彆電價政策在相應時間段內對技術進步有負麵影響。
차별전개정책작위절능감배정책재고모능공업행업상적실천,위배경규제화기업활동관계적연구제공료“의자연실험”적궤회。문장이용비삼수적연구방법,장배차법화경향득분필배법상결합,연구료차별전개정책여하통과증가기업성본화개변산업효솔,최종영향미관기업적공업증가치、공업총산치、공자화리윤등경제활동변량。이용2003~2007년상관규제행업기업적미관수거,실증발현차별전개정책재정체상대상관행업유불리영향。재공제노동력화자본변화적전제하,정책루계조성공업총산치약8%,공업증가치약9%,공자약25%,리윤약99%적부면영향。해실증결과표명차별전개정책재상응시간단내대기술진보유부면영향。
The differential electricity price policy is a practice of environmental regulation on the industrial sector in China. The goal of this policy is not only environment - oriented but also is to improve industrial technology. This paper first uses a non - parameter general equilibrium model to present how such policy will affect eco-nomic behavior of related firms through the encourage of technology change and the incremental of energy prices. Then using the method of propensity score matching, the paper analyzes the firm level data to find the average treatment effect for industrial economic variable such as output, value added, wage and profit. The direction of treatment from the policy implicates that, although it varies from industry to industry, the general effect on technology is negative. The variation of average treatment effect could be explained by heterogeneous characteristic through industries, especially the ratio of small firms in industry.