CAJ | 학술논문

近三十年来,中国社会史研究方法开拓性和创新性比较突出的有以下路径：开掘民间史料、借鉴社会科学研究方法、社会（田野）调查法、个案研究与微观研究、社会心理分析—心态史、词语分析法—概念史、文化建构方法等。这些新路径的开拓,反映了社会史在研究方法上突破了传统史学的格局,呈现立体化、多层面、精细化的推进,正在形成具有自身学科特色的理论方法、概念工具和词汇系列,这是社会史学科走向成熟的标志。同时社会史研究也存在碎片化、平面化、浅薄化、过度社会科学化、重复性研究过多、缺少独立理论创新等缺陷。学科发展和时代需求,呼唤中国社会史研究为当今中国社会转型及中国发展道路提供理论创新成果。
근삼십년래,중국사회사연구방법개탁성화창신성비교돌출적유이하로경：개굴민간사료、차감사회과학연구방법、사회（전야）조사법、개안연구여미관연구、사회심리분석—심태사、사어분석법—개념사、문화건구방법등。저사신로경적개탁,반영료사회사재연구방법상돌파료전통사학적격국,정현입체화、다층면、정세화적추진,정재형성구유자신학과특색적이론방법、개념공구화사회계렬,저시사회사학과주향성숙적표지。동시사회사연구야존재쇄편화、평면화、천박화、과도사회과학화、중복성연구과다、결소독립이론창신등결함。학과발전화시대수구,호환중국사회사연구위당금중국사회전형급중국발전도로제공이론창신성과。
During the thirty years of the development of China social history, the research methods innovate greatly in these following paths： folk history digging, social sciences research methods, social （field） survey, case studies and microscopic studies, psychological history, word a- nalysis-concept history, culture construction methods. The opening up of these new paths reflects that the research method of social history breaks the traditional pattern of history, shows the three-di- mensional, muhi-level, fine propulsion, and is forming its theory, concept protocols and words se- ries, which is the sign for the social sciences to become mature. At the same time, there are also limitations for the social history research, for example, fragmentation, flatness, shallowness, exces- sive social scientificness, too many repetitive researches, lack of independent theoretical innovation. These bottlenecks are waiting to be broken. The development of the discipline and the need of the age is calling for theoretical innovation to the transformation and development of Chinese society.