CAJ | 학술논문

在财产损害赔偿案件中,纠纷解决的时间跨度及被侵害物市价的变动不居,使得选择不同的时间点作为计算损失额的基准时间,数额有别,直接影响当事人利益。《侵权责任法》第19条规定以损失发生时为基准时间,置此后至作出判决期间的价格变动于不顾,仅能使被侵权人回复至侵权行为发生前的＂原有状态＂,并不能使其回复至如同侵权行为未发生时的＂应有状态＂,有违侵权损害赔偿宗旨,亦与损失评估、司法实践不符,难以解决纠纷。就此,在被侵害物市价无明显波动时,可以损失发生时为基准时间;反之,则需依填补损失、预防侵权理念确定公正的基准时间。
재재산손해배상안건중,규분해결적시간과도급피침해물시개적변동불거,사득선택불동적시간점작위계산손실액적기준시간,수액유별,직접영향당사인이익。《침권책임법》제19조규정이손실발생시위기준시간,치차후지작출판결기간적개격변동우불고,부능사피침권인회복지침권행위발생전적＂원유상태＂,병불능사기회복지여동침권행위미발생시적＂응유상태＂,유위침권손해배상종지,역여손실평고、사법실천불부,난이해결규분。취차,재피침해물시개무명현파동시,가이손실발생시위기준시간;반지,칙수의전보손실、예방침권이념학정공정적기준시간。
With regard to property damages cases,the duration of dispute settlement and market price of the damaged property may change constantly,so that different benchmarks of time to calculate damage and loss may have been selected resulting in different amounts of damages,which would directly affect the interest of parties concerned. In accordance with Article 19 of the Tort Law,the occurrence of loss is the benchmark time and the price change thereafter till the judgment has been neglected,thus the infringed party can be compensated only to the ＂original state＂prior to the tortious conduct,but not to the ＂proper state＂as if the tortious conduct has never happened. Such rule on the benchmark time may fail to resolve disputes since it goes against the purpose of compensation and is incompatible with the assessment of loss and judicial practice. Thus,it is held that in case of no significant price fluctuation of the damaged property,the occurrence of loss should be specified as the benchmark time; otherwise,the benchmark time should be determined according to the principle of loss compensation and prevention of torts.