北方法学
北方法學
북방법학
NORTHERN LEGAL SCIENCE
2015年
1期
105~112
,共null页
环境侵权 因果关系 证明责任分配
環境侵權 因果關繫 證明責任分配
배경침권 인과관계 증명책임분배
environmental torts; causation; allocation of burden of proof
在法律规定较为原则的情况下,司法实践对环境侵权案件在侵权行为、损害后果和因果关系的证明责任问题,已经形成了值得肯定的做法。但对酌定确定损害赔偿额的,法院应当通过释明保障当事人知晓和辩论的程序利益。对污染导致身体疾病案件应根据不同情况分别采取证明责任倒置、疫学因果关系证明、合比例认定原则等降低受害人证明责任。
在法律規定較為原則的情況下,司法實踐對環境侵權案件在侵權行為、損害後果和因果關繫的證明責任問題,已經形成瞭值得肯定的做法。但對酌定確定損害賠償額的,法院應噹通過釋明保障噹事人知曉和辯論的程序利益。對汙染導緻身體疾病案件應根據不同情況分彆採取證明責任倒置、疫學因果關繫證明、閤比例認定原則等降低受害人證明責任。
재법률규정교위원칙적정황하,사법실천대배경침권안건재침권행위、손해후과화인과관계적증명책임문제,이경형성료치득긍정적주법。단대작정학정손해배상액적,법원응당통과석명보장당사인지효화변론적정서이익。대오염도치신체질병안건응근거불동정황분별채취증명책임도치、역학인과관계증명、합비례인정원칙등강저수해인증명책임。
In light of the rather general regulations by law,judicial practice has gradually developed positive and feasible rules on burden of proof pertinent to tortious conducts,damages and causation in environmental torts cases. In case that the amount of damage is determined by discretion,judges should inform the parties concerned their procedural interests to know and to debate. With regard to claims for pollution- related diseases,different rules should be applied in different situations,such as shifting burden of proof,causation of epidemiology and proportionate determination.