华中师范大学学报:人文社会科学版
華中師範大學學報:人文社會科學版
화중사범대학학보:인문사회과학판
Journal of Central China Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
2015年
1期
95~104
,共null页
《呐喊》 《彷徨》 “孤独者” “狼子村” “长明灯” “礼教” “庸俗”
《吶喊》 《彷徨》 “孤獨者” “狼子村” “長明燈” “禮教” “庸俗”
《눌함》 《방황》 “고독자” “랑자촌” “장명등” “례교” “용속”
Screaming; Hesitation; solitaries; wolf village; Confucianism; vulgarity
《呐喊》与《彷徨》的创作主题,并不是学界原先所阐释的那样,被理解为攻击儒学"礼教",而是通过一系列形象化的故事叙事,深刻地揭示文化个体与文化共同体之间关系的错综复杂性。鲁迅从"孤独者"与"狼子村"的思想对峙中,发现了构成乡土中国文化"长明灯"的历史原因:"庸众"与"庸俗"作为乡土中国的强大势力,一直都在以其强大的社会存在,与作为精英意识的儒学礼教形成对抗。因此在鲁迅个人看来,"庸俗"与"礼教"是截然对立的两个概念,反"传统"的重点也应首先放在反"庸俗"方面,这才是《呐喊》与《彷徨》改造"国民性"思想的真实表达。
《吶喊》與《彷徨》的創作主題,併不是學界原先所闡釋的那樣,被理解為攻擊儒學"禮教",而是通過一繫列形象化的故事敘事,深刻地揭示文化箇體與文化共同體之間關繫的錯綜複雜性。魯迅從"孤獨者"與"狼子村"的思想對峙中,髮現瞭構成鄉土中國文化"長明燈"的歷史原因:"庸衆"與"庸俗"作為鄉土中國的彊大勢力,一直都在以其彊大的社會存在,與作為精英意識的儒學禮教形成對抗。因此在魯迅箇人看來,"庸俗"與"禮教"是截然對立的兩箇概唸,反"傳統"的重點也應首先放在反"庸俗"方麵,這纔是《吶喊》與《彷徨》改造"國民性"思想的真實錶達。
《눌함》여《방황》적창작주제,병불시학계원선소천석적나양,피리해위공격유학"례교",이시통과일계렬형상화적고사서사,심각지게시문화개체여문화공동체지간관계적착종복잡성。로신종"고독자"여"랑자촌"적사상대치중,발현료구성향토중국문화"장명등"적역사원인:"용음"여"용속"작위향토중국적강대세력,일직도재이기강대적사회존재,여작위정영의식적유학례교형성대항。인차재로신개인간래,"용속"여"례교"시절연대립적량개개념,반"전통"적중점야응수선방재반"용속"방면,저재시《눌함》여《방황》개조"국민성"사상적진실표체。
The themes of Lu Xun' s novels Screamingand Hesitation are not to attack "Confucianism "as was interpreted by previous literary researchers,but to reveal the complexity of the relationship between cultural individual and cultural community through a series of vivid stories.Lu Xun has found the historical reasons for "altar lamps" of the Chinese local cultures from the mental confrontations between "solitaries" and "wolf village" : "vulgarity" and "mediocre mass",as strong forces in Chinese countryside,have been defying the so-called elite "Confucianism".In Lu Xun' s eyes,since "vulgarity" and "Confucianism " are two confronting concepts,anti-tradition should focus on anti-vulgarity,which is what "reforming national characters" really means in Screamingand Hesitation.