中国行政管理
中國行政管理
중국행정관리
Chinese Public Administration
2015年
2期
43~48
,共null页
政府与市场 政府与社会 PX项目事件 范式转变
政府與市場 政府與社會 PX項目事件 範式轉變
정부여시장 정부여사회 PX항목사건 범식전변
government and market, government and society, public events of PX project, paradigm transformation.
政府、市场与社会三者之间的关系问题是新阶段全面深化改革、转变政府职能的核心领域。本文以广东茂名PX项目事件等典型案例为基础,从政府、市场和社会三者关系维度开展利益博弈分析,对于传统的政府与市场、政府与社会关系传统模式进行了剖析,进而归纳三者关系失衡的结构特征。研究发现,在利益博弈格局中,政府不仅是简单的社会治理和市场管制者,还是博弈的一方,由此导致三者之间原有的平衡状态被打破,引发社会不理性的行为选择。由此传统的政社关系、政企关系模式和结构已经不能适用于地方政府治理的实践,一个以公共利益池塘分配机制为核心,以多元价值决策的政府、新理性思维选择的市场、有序参与的社会有机构成的新关系模式显得尤为重要。
政府、市場與社會三者之間的關繫問題是新階段全麵深化改革、轉變政府職能的覈心領域。本文以廣東茂名PX項目事件等典型案例為基礎,從政府、市場和社會三者關繫維度開展利益博弈分析,對于傳統的政府與市場、政府與社會關繫傳統模式進行瞭剖析,進而歸納三者關繫失衡的結構特徵。研究髮現,在利益博弈格跼中,政府不僅是簡單的社會治理和市場管製者,還是博弈的一方,由此導緻三者之間原有的平衡狀態被打破,引髮社會不理性的行為選擇。由此傳統的政社關繫、政企關繫模式和結構已經不能適用于地方政府治理的實踐,一箇以公共利益池塘分配機製為覈心,以多元價值決策的政府、新理性思維選擇的市場、有序參與的社會有機構成的新關繫模式顯得尤為重要。
정부、시장여사회삼자지간적관계문제시신계단전면심화개혁、전변정부직능적핵심영역。본문이엄동무명PX항목사건등전형안례위기출,종정부、시장화사회삼자관계유도개전이익박혁분석,대우전통적정부여시장、정부여사회관계전통모식진행료부석,진이귀납삼자관계실형적결구특정。연구발현,재이익박혁격국중,정부불부시간단적사회치리화시장관제자,환시박혁적일방,유차도치삼자지간원유적평형상태피타파,인발사회불이성적행위선택。유차전통적정사관계、정기관계모식화결구이경불능괄용우지방정부치리적실천,일개이공공이익지당분배궤제위핵심,이다원개치결책적정부、신이성사유선택적시장、유서삼여적사회유궤구성적신관계모식현득우위중요。
The relationship of government, market and society has been in the core domains at the new stage for comprehensive reform and government function transformation. This research is based on typical cases of PX project advocated by local government like that of Mao--Ming City etc. it analyzes the government, market and society relationships in the interest gaming process, then it goes on to analyses traditional model of government, market and society relationship. A summary is also provided of the unbalanced characters of the model's structure. This research has found that in the interests game pattern local government is not only an impartial social and market regulator simply, but also a participator of the game. It has resulted in broken balances and has induced irrational public choices. So the traditional model and governance structure with government, society and market relationship is not suitable for local governing practices. It is especially important that a new relationship model be adopted which is organically composed of the following elements: a distribution mechanism of public interests pool as core factor, a multiple values-included decision making, a new rational thinking and of market choice, and a new order of society participation.