CAJ | 학술논문

教授治学与教授治校在中国作为备受争议的一对学术概念，既存在差异又相互联系。治学与治校的合法性来源不同，治学表示学术事务的治理权。是一种知识权力；而治校则指向学术组织的治理权，是一种组织权力，二者产生关联起源于学术活动的组织化。治学与治校并不存在严格的二分，学校事务以学术事务为核心，学术治理离不开学校治理的支持，教授治学与治校本身是一个连续体，而不是对立面。无论是教授治学还是治校，其核心都是对中国大学内部治理模式的探索，旨在重建以学术权力为核心的制度框架和组织结构。
교수치학여교수치교재중국작위비수쟁의적일대학술개념，기존재차이우상호련계。치학여치교적합법성래원불동，치학표시학술사무적치리권。시일충지식권력；이치교칙지향학술조직적치리권，시일충조직권력，이자산생관련기원우학술활동적조직화。치학여치교병불존재엄격적이분，학교사무이학술사무위핵심，학술치리리불개학교치리적지지，교수치학여치교본신시일개련속체，이불시대립면。무론시교수치학환시치교，기핵심도시대중국대학내부치리모식적탐색，지재중건이학술권력위핵심적제도광가화조직결구。
Academic governance by professors and administrative governance by professors have been a couple of controversial concepts for a long time in China. There are similarities as well as disparities between the two concepts. Academic governance and administrative governance have different legitimate sources in that the former is the governance power on knowledge while the latter is the governance power on organization, which began to connect with each other since the systematization of academic activities. There is no absolute distinction between academic governance and administrative governance which, in essence, are continuums rather than opposites for the fact that both of them are indispensable to each other. Regardless of literal debate, both of the two concepts are the exploration of inner governance structure for China＇ s universities, aiming to rebuild an institutional framework and organizational structure that operates on the logic of academic power.