CAJ | 학술논문

《法律适用法》是形成中国社会主义法律体系的必备条件，也是我国国际私法立法中最重要最核心的部分，是目前我国国际私法立法体系中的基本法。《法律适用法》的效力问题的规定之所以引致纷争，是因为该法体系化不彻底，欠缺科学性。严格来说，《法律适用法》与《海商法》等特别法并不存在效力上的冲突，该法第二条的意义在于将《海商法》等特别法衔接、统合于国际私法体系之中。《民法通则》等与《法律适用法》是同位法，他们之间按照新法优先原则来协调彼此之间的效力冲突问题符合立法目的。
《법률괄용법》시형성중국사회주의법률체계적필비조건，야시아국국제사법입법중최중요최핵심적부분，시목전아국국제사법입법체계중적기본법。《법률괄용법》적효력문제적규정지소이인치분쟁，시인위해법체계화불철저，흠결과학성。엄격래설，《법률괄용법》여《해상법》등특별법병불존재효력상적충돌，해법제이조적의의재우장《해상법》등특별법함접、통합우국제사법체계지중。《민법통칙》등여《법률괄용법》시동위법，타문지간안조신법우선원칙래협조피차지간적효력충돌문제부합입법목적。
The Application Law is an essential condition of forming China＇ s system of socialist laws and the core part and basic law of China＇ s private international law legislation. The reason why there are disputes con- cerning the provisions of effectiveness of The Application Law is that this law is halfway systematization and halfway scientific notation. Strictly speaking, there exist no conflicts among the Application Law, Maritime Law and other special laws alike. The significance of Article 2 of The Application Law is that it links up and unifies Maritime Law and other laws alike in the private international law system. The General Rules of Civil Law alike and The Application Law are parities, so when there are disputes of effectiveness between them we use ＂lex posterior derogat priori＂ method to settle them to be consistent with legislative intent.