中南大学学报:社会科学版
中南大學學報:社會科學版
중남대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of Central South Huiversity: Social Science
2015年
1期
51~58
,共null页
制定法 习惯法 教义学 构成要件 违法性 有责性
製定法 習慣法 教義學 構成要件 違法性 有責性
제정법 습관법 교의학 구성요건 위법성 유책성
statute law;customary law;dogmatics;constituents;illegality;culpability
法教义学的路径可以缓解当前司法人员面对刑事制定法与习惯法冲突时所面临的尴尬。法教义学视野下习惯法的运行逻辑主要通过对犯罪成立要件的判断来实现。习惯法于规范构成要件要素和开放的构成要件的认定中具有较大运行空间,但为保证构成要件的定型性,在构成要件解释时,其他要素或要件的解释应尽可能排除习惯法的影响。在违法性判断阶段,习惯法的判断主要是借助社会相当性理论来实现。由于违法的判断是实质的、具体的,故习惯法在此的判断应当结合具体个案分析。在有责性判断中,违法性认识尽管于理论上是习惯法出罪的一条路径,但实际功用很小,更合适的路径应是期待可能性的判断。然目前对期待可能性之理解过于偏狭,应依规范责任论对这一理论进行适当重构。
法教義學的路徑可以緩解噹前司法人員麵對刑事製定法與習慣法遲突時所麵臨的尷尬。法教義學視野下習慣法的運行邏輯主要通過對犯罪成立要件的判斷來實現。習慣法于規範構成要件要素和開放的構成要件的認定中具有較大運行空間,但為保證構成要件的定型性,在構成要件解釋時,其他要素或要件的解釋應儘可能排除習慣法的影響。在違法性判斷階段,習慣法的判斷主要是藉助社會相噹性理論來實現。由于違法的判斷是實質的、具體的,故習慣法在此的判斷應噹結閤具體箇案分析。在有責性判斷中,違法性認識儘管于理論上是習慣法齣罪的一條路徑,但實際功用很小,更閤適的路徑應是期待可能性的判斷。然目前對期待可能性之理解過于偏狹,應依規範責任論對這一理論進行適噹重構。
법교의학적로경가이완해당전사법인원면대형사제정법여습관법충돌시소면림적감개。법교의학시야하습관법적운행라집주요통과대범죄성립요건적판단래실현。습관법우규범구성요건요소화개방적구성요건적인정중구유교대운행공간,단위보증구성요건적정형성,재구성요건해석시,기타요소혹요건적해석응진가능배제습관법적영향。재위법성판단계단,습관법적판단주요시차조사회상당성이론래실현。유우위법적판단시실질적、구체적,고습관법재차적판단응당결합구체개안분석。재유책성판단중,위법성인식진관우이론상시습관법출죄적일조로경,단실제공용흔소,경합괄적로경응시기대가능성적판단。연목전대기대가능성지리해과우편협,응의규범책임론대저일이론진행괄당중구。
The path of dogmatics can alleviate the judicial personnel’s discomfiture in the face of the conflict between criminal law and customary law. From the perspective of dogmatics, the operation logic of customary law is mainly realized by the judgment of crime constituents. The customary law has large operation space in regulating normative constituents and their open recognition. But in order to ensure the shaping elements of these constituents, other elements should be interpreted as far as possible to eliminate the influence of the customary law. In judging criminal illegality, the judgment of customary law is mainly realized by social considerable theory. Because judging illegality is real and concrete, judgment of the customary law should be combined with the specific case. In judging culpability, even though illegality cognition is, in theory, a path of crime for the customary law, the actual effect is very small. A more suitable path should be looking forward to the possibility of judgment, which is, however, very limited. Therefore, the theory should be properly constructed in accordance with the normative theory of culpability.