地域研究与开发
地域研究與開髮
지역연구여개발
Areal Research and Development
2015年
1期
14~18
,共null页
承接产业转移 影响因素 差异化政策 中西部地区
承接產業轉移 影響因素 差異化政策 中西部地區
승접산업전이 영향인소 차이화정책 중서부지구
undertaking industrial transfer; influencing factors; differentiated policy; Midwest of China
将中西部地区划分为东北、中部、西北、西南4个区域,采用1995-2013年的相关数据,分析各区域在承接东部发达地区产业转移过程中的主要影响因素。选取的影响因素包括资本存量、经济规模、劳动力成本、人力资源和路径效应。结果发现:4个区域的路径效应、资本存量与产业转移承接地均存在显著正相关关系;人力资源与产业转移承接地存在正相关关系,但东北、西北地区不显著;劳动力成本与产业转移承接地存在负相关关系,但对东北地区不显著;除中部地区外,经济规模与产业转移承接地并不存在显著相关关系。中西部区域地方政府和企业家在促进产业转移进程中应充分发挥比较优势,根据不同影响要素制定宏观政策与微观引资策略。
將中西部地區劃分為東北、中部、西北、西南4箇區域,採用1995-2013年的相關數據,分析各區域在承接東部髮達地區產業轉移過程中的主要影響因素。選取的影響因素包括資本存量、經濟規模、勞動力成本、人力資源和路徑效應。結果髮現:4箇區域的路徑效應、資本存量與產業轉移承接地均存在顯著正相關關繫;人力資源與產業轉移承接地存在正相關關繫,但東北、西北地區不顯著;勞動力成本與產業轉移承接地存在負相關關繫,但對東北地區不顯著;除中部地區外,經濟規模與產業轉移承接地併不存在顯著相關關繫。中西部區域地方政府和企業傢在促進產業轉移進程中應充分髮揮比較優勢,根據不同影響要素製定宏觀政策與微觀引資策略。
장중서부지구화분위동북、중부、서북、서남4개구역,채용1995-2013년적상관수거,분석각구역재승접동부발체지구산업전이과정중적주요영향인소。선취적영향인소포괄자본존량、경제규모、노동력성본、인력자원화로경효응。결과발현:4개구역적로경효응、자본존량여산업전이승접지균존재현저정상관관계;인력자원여산업전이승접지존재정상관관계,단동북、서북지구불현저;노동력성본여산업전이승접지존재부상관관계,단대동북지구불현저;제중부지구외,경제규모여산업전이승접지병불존재현저상관관계。중서부구역지방정부화기업가재촉진산업전이진정중응충분발휘비교우세,근거불동영향요소제정굉관정책여미관인자책략。
The Midwest of China is divided into four regions : the northeast, central, northwest, southwest. Using data from 1995 to 2013, we analyzed influencing factors in the undertaking industrial transfer process of four regions, and the selected factors includes capital stock, the size of the economy, labor costs, human resources, and path effects. The results show that :① path effects and capital stock of the four regions to undertaking industrial transfer have a significant positive correlation; ② human resources to undertaking industrial transfer have a positive correlation, but significantly difference in the various regions; ③ labor costs to undertaking industrial transfer have a negative correlation, but not significant in northeast region. In addition to the central region, the economic scale to undertaking industrial transfer has no correlation. To promote industrial transfer, local government and entrepreneurs of Midwest should give full play to the comparative advantage, and according to the different impacting elements, formulated macroeconomic policies and micro investment attract strategy.