地域研究与开发
地域研究與開髮
지역연구여개발
Areal Research and Development
2015年
1期
160~165
,共null页
朱泰峰 张凤荣 李灿 汪露
硃泰峰 張鳳榮 李燦 汪露
주태봉 장봉영 리찬 왕로
农村居民点 集约利用 层次分析 熵值法 门头沟区 北京市
農村居民點 集約利用 層次分析 熵值法 門頭溝區 北京市
농촌거민점 집약이용 층차분석 적치법 문두구구 북경시
rural residential area; intensive use; analytic hierarchy process; entropy method; Mentougou District ; Beijing City
探讨了农村居民点用地集约利用内涵,从投入强度、使用强度、经济效益以及布局效应4个方面选取18个单项指标构建农村居民点用地集约利用评价指标体系。在农村居民点用地集约利用评价存在区域差异性的前提下,采用层次分析法、自然间断点分级法和多因素综合法分析评价北京市门头沟区农村居民点用地的集约利用水平。区位因素以及规划战略定位是影响农村居民点用地投入强度的最重要因素,投入强度大的乡镇中企业用地、基础服务设施用地比例偏高;邻近镇中心区的农村居民点用地使用强度大,使用强度最大的乡镇为研究区土地利用战略规划的次中心;通过发展第三产业所带来的收入差距更明显。在布局效应方面农村居民点用地多样性指标差异最显著,近市区农村居民点用地没有与城市发展融为一体。在综合集约利用方面,门头沟区137个农村居民点中非集约、低度集约、中度集约和高度集约的农村居民点的比例分别为18.25%,27.01%,28.47%,26.28%,集约利用评价平均分值分别为45.09,51.70,58.07,65.03。区位和经济因素是影响农村居民点用地集约利用程度的关键因素,在空间分布上,邻近新城和各镇中心区的农村居民点在投入强度、使用强度和经济效益方面均表现出较高的集约性,而布局效应不具有类似分布规律。城乡一体化并非城乡一样化,农村居民点用地实现集约利用具有多种途径。
探討瞭農村居民點用地集約利用內涵,從投入彊度、使用彊度、經濟效益以及佈跼效應4箇方麵選取18箇單項指標構建農村居民點用地集約利用評價指標體繫。在農村居民點用地集約利用評價存在區域差異性的前提下,採用層次分析法、自然間斷點分級法和多因素綜閤法分析評價北京市門頭溝區農村居民點用地的集約利用水平。區位因素以及規劃戰略定位是影響農村居民點用地投入彊度的最重要因素,投入彊度大的鄉鎮中企業用地、基礎服務設施用地比例偏高;鄰近鎮中心區的農村居民點用地使用彊度大,使用彊度最大的鄉鎮為研究區土地利用戰略規劃的次中心;通過髮展第三產業所帶來的收入差距更明顯。在佈跼效應方麵農村居民點用地多樣性指標差異最顯著,近市區農村居民點用地沒有與城市髮展融為一體。在綜閤集約利用方麵,門頭溝區137箇農村居民點中非集約、低度集約、中度集約和高度集約的農村居民點的比例分彆為18.25%,27.01%,28.47%,26.28%,集約利用評價平均分值分彆為45.09,51.70,58.07,65.03。區位和經濟因素是影響農村居民點用地集約利用程度的關鍵因素,在空間分佈上,鄰近新城和各鎮中心區的農村居民點在投入彊度、使用彊度和經濟效益方麵均錶現齣較高的集約性,而佈跼效應不具有類似分佈規律。城鄉一體化併非城鄉一樣化,農村居民點用地實現集約利用具有多種途徑。
탐토료농촌거민점용지집약이용내함,종투입강도、사용강도、경제효익이급포국효응4개방면선취18개단항지표구건농촌거민점용지집약이용평개지표체계。재농촌거민점용지집약이용평개존재구역차이성적전제하,채용층차분석법、자연간단점분급법화다인소종합법분석평개북경시문두구구농촌거민점용지적집약이용수평。구위인소이급규화전략정위시영향농촌거민점용지투입강도적최중요인소,투입강도대적향진중기업용지、기출복무설시용지비례편고;린근진중심구적농촌거민점용지사용강도대,사용강도최대적향진위연구구토지이용전략규화적차중심;통과발전제삼산업소대래적수입차거경명현。재포국효응방면농촌거민점용지다양성지표차이최현저,근시구농촌거민점용지몰유여성시발전융위일체。재종합집약이용방면,문두구구137개농촌거민점중비집약、저도집약、중도집약화고도집약적농촌거민점적비례분별위18.25%,27.01%,28.47%,26.28%,집약이용평개평균분치분별위45.09,51.70,58.07,65.03。구위화경제인소시영향농촌거민점용지집약이용정도적관건인소,재공간분포상,린근신성화각진중심구적농촌거민점재투입강도、사용강도화경제효익방면균표현출교고적집약성,이포국효응불구유유사분포규률。성향일체화병비성향일양화,농촌거민점용지실현집약이용구유다충도경。
The connotation of intensive utilization of rural residential land was discussed in this paper. 18 individual indicators selected from the input-intensity, service strength, economic benefits, as well as the arrangement effects have been constructed the evaluation index system of intensive use of rural residential land. Based on the premise of the different aspects on the evaluation of intensive use of rural residential land should be emphasized in different evaluation area, the evaluation methods of analytic hierarchy process( AHP), the natural discontinuity points classification and multi-factors were used, this article analyzed and evaluated the degree of intensive use of rural resi-dential land in Mentougou District of Beijing. Location and strategic orientation in land use planning are the key factors to the input-intensity of rural residential land, the proportion of industrial land and public service facilities is higher in the level of high input-intensity township; rural residential land with high degree service strength mainly locate near the center of its township, the township with maximum level of service strength is the west development centre in the land use planning of the study area; income from the tertiary industry is more obvious ; The diversity indicator is more useful to characterize the significant difference in the aspect of the layout effects of rural residential land, rural settlements near the urban area had not been integrated with urban development. Among the 137 rural settle- ments to be evaluated in Mentougou District, the comprehensive intensive use were divided into four degrees, which were not intensive, low degree intensive, moderate intensive and highly intensive, and the proportion were 18.25%, 27.01%, 28.47% and 26.28% respectively, the average intensive use evaluation scores were 45.09, 51.70, 58.07 and 65.03 respectively. Location and economic factors were the key factors to intensive use of the land use for rural residential. In the spatial distribution, the degree of intensive use of rural settlements which was close to new cities and the central area of the towns has been relatively high in the input intensity, use intensity and economic benefits, which is different from the layout effects. To achieve the integration of urban and rural areas, the studies suggest that different methods of improving the intensive use of land should be used to highlight the differences between urban and rural areas; there are a variety of ways to implement the rural residential land intensive use.