CAJ | 학술논문

皮凯蒂的《21世纪资本论》一书，最近先是在西方，后来在中国引起热烈的关注和争议。它提出了资本的收益率（r）大于经济增长率（g），从而导致财富集中和贫富分化的结论及解决方案。但我们或许首先需要反省一下其中人们可能已经觉得自明的经济平等的前提：即我们是因为什么要平等？各种各样的平等诉求是否需要有一个满足的先后次序？是否任何一种平等都能直接等同于公正？除了平等，人们还有没有其他的基本价值诉求需要满足？这就引入到考虑经济平等与其他平等诉求之间的平衡；以及平等与其他基本价值目标的平衡。
피개체적《21세기자본론》일서，최근선시재서방，후래재중국인기열렬적관주화쟁의。타제출료자본적수익솔（r）대우경제증장솔（g），종이도치재부집중화빈부분화적결론급해결방안。단아문혹허수선수요반성일하기중인문가능이경각득자명적경제평등적전제：즉아문시인위십요요평등？각충각양적평등소구시부수요유일개만족적선후차서？시부임하일충평등도능직접등동우공정？제료평등，인문환유몰유기타적기본개치소구수요만족？저취인입도고필경제평등여기타평등소구지간적평형；이급평등여기타기본개치목표적평형。
Thomas Piketty＇ s Capital in the Twenty-First Century has recently drawn great attention and sparked heated debates first in the West, and then in China. It proposes that the rate of return on capital （r） is greater than the rate of economic growth （g） , which leads to the conclusion about the concentration of wealth and polarization between the rich and the poor, and its solution. But it might be necessary for us to reflect firstly on the premise of economic equality that people might have found self-evident. Why should we be on an equal footing？ Is it necessary for various equality appeals to be placed in a satisfactory sequence？ Can any equality be directly equated with justice？ In addition to equality, do people have other appeals to their basic values that require satisfaction？ Thus these questions lead to the consideration of the equilibrium between the appeal to substantive economic equality and the appeals to other equal rights, and also the equilibrium between equality and the goal of other basic values.