北京大学学报:哲学社会科学版
北京大學學報:哲學社會科學版
북경대학학보:철학사회과학판
Journal of Peking University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
2015年
1期
90~98
,共null页
湖湘经学 李文熠 王文清 余廷灿
湖湘經學 李文熠 王文清 餘廷燦
호상경학 리문습 왕문청 여정찬
study of Confucian classics by Hunan scholars, Li Wenzhao (李文炤), Wang Wenqing (王文清), Yu Tingcan (余廷灿)
学界对清代湘学史的研究成果多集中在晚清部分,而对清代前中期的湖湘学术(尤其是这一时期的经学史)研究不多。从湖南文化发展的内在脉络来看,明末清初的湖南确实不能算作“人文被沾”之地。然而自王夫之以后,清初的湖南说经注经者不绝如缕。雍乾之际,学风丕变,湖南仍有一些以经学名家的学者,留下了相当可观的经学著作,李文熠、王文清、余廷灿便是其中的佼佼者。清代前中期湖湘经学家多重视礼学,强调践履与实用;不分汉宋而博采诸长。这些共同特征,不仅使得清代前中期的湖湘经学在当时占有一席之地,同时对晚清湘学的崛起有着深刻的影响。
學界對清代湘學史的研究成果多集中在晚清部分,而對清代前中期的湖湘學術(尤其是這一時期的經學史)研究不多。從湖南文化髮展的內在脈絡來看,明末清初的湖南確實不能算作“人文被霑”之地。然而自王伕之以後,清初的湖南說經註經者不絕如縷。雍乾之際,學風丕變,湖南仍有一些以經學名傢的學者,留下瞭相噹可觀的經學著作,李文熠、王文清、餘廷燦便是其中的佼佼者。清代前中期湖湘經學傢多重視禮學,彊調踐履與實用;不分漢宋而博採諸長。這些共同特徵,不僅使得清代前中期的湖湘經學在噹時佔有一席之地,同時對晚清湘學的崛起有著深刻的影響。
학계대청대상학사적연구성과다집중재만청부분,이대청대전중기적호상학술(우기시저일시기적경학사)연구불다。종호남문화발전적내재맥락래간,명말청초적호남학실불능산작“인문피첨”지지。연이자왕부지이후,청초적호남설경주경자불절여루。옹건지제,학풍비변,호남잉유일사이경학명가적학자,류하료상당가관적경학저작,리문습、왕문청、여정찬편시기중적교교자。청대전중기호상경학가다중시례학,강조천리여실용;불분한송이박채제장。저사공동특정,불부사득청대전중기적호상경학재당시점유일석지지,동시대만청상학적굴기유착심각적영향。
The academic circles have focused their research mostly on the study of Confucian classics by Hunan scholars made during the late Qing Dynasty. But they have done very little research concerning the study of Confucian classics, and especially the history of Confucian classics study made by Hunan scholars during the early and mid-Qing Dynasty. True that little cultural development was made in Hunan at the turning point between the late Ming Dynasty and the early Qing Dynasty. But there appeared many learned scholars who followed Wang Fuzhi (王夫之) in making explanations and annotations of Confucian classics in the early Qing Dynasty. During the reign of Emperors Yongzheng (雍正) and Qianlong (乾隆) , changes took place in academic atmosphere. Some scholars who were engaged in the study of Confucian classics wrote quite a lot of books about Confucian classics. Li Wenzhao (李文炤) were typical representatives among them. Most of , Wang Wenqing (王文清), and Yu Tingcan ( the Hunan scholars attached importance to the ritual study (礼学) and stressed the significance of practice. They made no strict distinction between the Han school (汉学) and the Song school (宋学) of Confucian classics study, but absorbed academic advantages extensively from various schools of thought. These common characteristics not only made the Hunan scholars of Confucian classics study occupy an important position in the academic circles during the early and mid-Qing Dynasty, but also produced a profound influence upon the rise of the study of Confucian classics in the late Qing Dynasty.