中国法学
中國法學
중국법학
China Legal Science
2015年
1期
169~186
,共null页
冒名行为 无权处分 善意取得 信赖保护
冒名行為 無權處分 善意取得 信賴保護
모명행위 무권처분 선의취득 신뢰보호
冒名处分他人不动产的行为既与无权处分不同也与无权代理有异,属于非典型案例。不动产冒名行为不符合不动产登记簿公信力的构成要件,因此不应适用《物权法》第106条或者类推适用该法第107条。为保护善意第三人的信赖,可以将不动产冒名行为类推适用于无权代理/表见代理制度,并透过被冒名者的可归责性与相对人信赖的合理性这两个要素的比较、权衡,在保障交易安全的同时,兼顾所有权人的利益。
冒名處分他人不動產的行為既與無權處分不同也與無權代理有異,屬于非典型案例。不動產冒名行為不符閤不動產登記簿公信力的構成要件,因此不應適用《物權法》第106條或者類推適用該法第107條。為保護善意第三人的信賴,可以將不動產冒名行為類推適用于無權代理/錶見代理製度,併透過被冒名者的可歸責性與相對人信賴的閤理性這兩箇要素的比較、權衡,在保障交易安全的同時,兼顧所有權人的利益。
모명처분타인불동산적행위기여무권처분불동야여무권대리유이,속우비전형안례。불동산모명행위불부합불동산등기부공신력적구성요건,인차불응괄용《물권법》제106조혹자유추괄용해법제107조。위보호선의제삼인적신뢰,가이장불동산모명행위유추괄용우무권대리/표견대리제도,병투과피모명자적가귀책성여상대인신뢰적합이성저량개요소적비교、권형,재보장교역안전적동시,겸고소유권인적이익。
Imposed disposal of real estate, different from unauthorized disposal and unauthorized agency, belongs to an atypical case. The behavior of imposture of real estate is not conformity with the constitutive element of the credibility of register book of real estate. Hence, article 106 of Property Law or analogy of article 107 cannot be applied. In order to protect the trust from a third party in good faith, the behavior of imposture of real estate can be applied for analogy of unauthorized agency or apparent agency. Through the comparison and balance between the accountability of the impersonated party and the rationality of trust from the counterpart, the interests of the owner shall be protected while guaranteeing the transaction safety.
