社会科学
社會科學
사회과학
Journal of Social Sciences
2015年
3期
59~71
,共null页
合作社组织 乡村治理结构 转型
閤作社組織 鄉村治理結構 轉型
합작사조직 향촌치리결구 전형
the Cooperative Organization; the Rural Social Governance Structure; Transformation
合作社组织的发展,一方面为乡村社会带来新型复杂的经济结构和其所包含的纷繁的利益关系,致使原有的村庄治理基础逐步瓦解;另一方面也改变了村庄治理的“生态系统”,为现有乡村治理增添了新的博弈主体,提供了新的重构的启示。合作社组织之所以能够参与乡村治理,就在于其以“经济业务”作为手段,通过“利益导控”引导以“自身利益最大化”为目标的农民的社会行为与选择,进而“统合”乡村社会,在此过程中逐渐改变先前的由政府和“类政府”(村党委与村委会等)等体制性色彩极强的组织所主导、以“强制性秩序维持”为核心目标的“单中心”治理结构,走向以“多主体协同”为手段和“协商性整合”为取向的新型治理结构。合作社组织参与乡村治理,表明市场化、契约化、组织化越来越深地嵌入进乡村基层治理机制之中。
閤作社組織的髮展,一方麵為鄉村社會帶來新型複雜的經濟結構和其所包含的紛繁的利益關繫,緻使原有的村莊治理基礎逐步瓦解;另一方麵也改變瞭村莊治理的“生態繫統”,為現有鄉村治理增添瞭新的博弈主體,提供瞭新的重構的啟示。閤作社組織之所以能夠參與鄉村治理,就在于其以“經濟業務”作為手段,通過“利益導控”引導以“自身利益最大化”為目標的農民的社會行為與選擇,進而“統閤”鄉村社會,在此過程中逐漸改變先前的由政府和“類政府”(村黨委與村委會等)等體製性色綵極彊的組織所主導、以“彊製性秩序維持”為覈心目標的“單中心”治理結構,走嚮以“多主體協同”為手段和“協商性整閤”為取嚮的新型治理結構。閤作社組織參與鄉村治理,錶明市場化、契約化、組織化越來越深地嵌入進鄉村基層治理機製之中。
합작사조직적발전,일방면위향촌사회대래신형복잡적경제결구화기소포함적분번적이익관계,치사원유적촌장치리기출축보와해;령일방면야개변료촌장치리적“생태계통”,위현유향촌치리증첨료신적박혁주체,제공료신적중구적계시。합작사조직지소이능구삼여향촌치리,취재우기이“경제업무”작위수단,통과“이익도공”인도이“자신이익최대화”위목표적농민적사회행위여선택,진이“통합”향촌사회,재차과정중축점개변선전적유정부화“류정부”(촌당위여촌위회등)등체제성색채겁강적조직소주도、이“강제성질서유지”위핵심목표적“단중심”치리결구,주향이“다주체협동”위수단화“협상성정합”위취향적신형치리결구。합작사조직삼여향촌치리,표명시장화、계약화、조직화월래월심지감입진향촌기층치리궤제지중。
The development of the cooperative organization would accelerate the transformation of the social structure. On one hand, it brought new sophisticated economic structure for rural society, which made the original village village governance foundation gradually collapsed. On the other hand, it also changed the governance ecosystem, added new game bodies for rural governance. If the cooperative organizations can participate in rnral governance was largely due to they changed the social behaviors and selections of the farmers who were focusing on maximizing their own interests by means of business, and then changed the governance structure from government and semi-government dominated style to the new one which was characterized by " the multi-agents collaboration" and " consultative integration ". The fact of the cooperative organizations participated the rural governance showed that marketization, contractualization, organization embedded into the rural grass-roots governance mechanism more and more deeply.