CAJ | 학술논문

实证研究方法满足了人类追求更准确的知识、信息和事实的需求。以应用为主的实证研究近年来也在法学研究中流行开来，但学界对其适用存在认识不足。在不同领域的法学研究中，实证法学研究方法与传统法学研究方法是一种互补而非竞争的关系。在规范和价值领域，语言实证使传统的规范分析甚至文献分析具有实证的属性。在事实领域，成熟的法学实证研究不仅可以回答事实是什么，而且能对价值判断提供重要依据。
실증연구방법만족료인류추구경준학적지식、신식화사실적수구。이응용위주적실증연구근년래야재법학연구중류행개래，단학계대기괄용존재인식불족。재불동영역적법학연구중，실증법학연구방법여전통법학연구방법시일충호보이비경쟁적관계。재규범화개치영역，어언실증사전통적규범분석심지문헌분석구유실증적속성。재사실영역，성숙적법학실증연구불부가이회답사실시십요，이차능대개치판단제공중요의거。
Empirical legal studies satisfied the needs of more accurate knowledge, information and facts. As an influential research method in Chinese legal academy, it is used improperly. The empirical legal method and the traditional research method are not competitive but complementary in various fields. In fields of Norm and Value, normative and literary analysis can be called Empirical. In field of Fact, matured empirical legal studies should make the turn from Empiricism to logical positivism.