CAJ | 학술논문

20世纪中国村落研究范式众多,然而仔细梳理公认的四种研究范式,发现其很难推而广之。原因在于研究者依据不同地域概括出的范式,既是一种自证预言,也忽视了村落共有的文化背景。这种文化背景既是当时村落社会公共性所在,也是更大层面社会共识能够达成的原因。回顾这一点有助于在新时期的乡村建设和研究中,更好地把握城镇化背景下的村落定位,推进新的村落文化公共性的形成,巩固社会团结和整合的基础。
20세기중국촌락연구범식음다,연이자세소리공인적사충연구범식,발현기흔난추이엄지。원인재우연구자의거불동지역개괄출적범식,기시일충자증예언,야홀시료촌락공유적문화배경。저충문화배경기시당시촌락사회공공성소재,야시경대층면사회공식능구체성적원인。회고저일점유조우재신시기적향촌건설화연구중,경호지파악성진화배경하적촌락정위,추진신적촌락문화공공성적형성,공고사회단결화정합적기출。
There are many paradigms of Chinese village research in 20th century. However, the four gen- erally acknowledged are difficult to be popularized after careful study. The reason is that the paradigms re- searchers summarized according to different region, are both a self-fulfilling prophecy and overlooking the com- mon cultural background of the villages. This cultural background is both the publicity of the villages and the reason why a greater level of social consensus can be achieved. Recalling this will help us in the new era of ru- ral development and research better positioned to grasp the villages under the background of urbanization and promote a new form of public cultural village and consolidate the foundation of social solidarity and integration.