河北法学
河北法學
하북법학
Hebei Law Science
2015年
3期
93~104
,共null页
南海 海洋法公约 强制争端解决程序 仲裁 管辖权
南海 海洋法公約 彊製爭耑解決程序 仲裁 管轄權
남해 해양법공약 강제쟁단해결정서 중재 관할권
South China Sea; The Law of Sea Convention; the compulsory dispute settlement prooision; arbitration; jurisdiction
菲律宾依据《联合国海洋法公约》有关强制争端解决程序的规定,就其与中国在南海海域的争议启动了仲裁程序。但强制仲裁程序的启动必须满足《联合国海洋法公约》所规定的前提条件,同时又受到若干限制。仲裁庭将如何裁决本案管辖权问题,需视菲律宾的举证情况以及仲裁庭对某些法律问题的裁决而定,我国应客观理性地进行评估,不应盲目乐观。
菲律賓依據《聯閤國海洋法公約》有關彊製爭耑解決程序的規定,就其與中國在南海海域的爭議啟動瞭仲裁程序。但彊製仲裁程序的啟動必鬚滿足《聯閤國海洋法公約》所規定的前提條件,同時又受到若榦限製。仲裁庭將如何裁決本案管轄權問題,需視菲律賓的舉證情況以及仲裁庭對某些法律問題的裁決而定,我國應客觀理性地進行評估,不應盲目樂觀。
비률빈의거《연합국해양법공약》유관강제쟁단해결정서적규정,취기여중국재남해해역적쟁의계동료중재정서。단강제중재정서적계동필수만족《연합국해양법공약》소규정적전제조건,동시우수도약간한제。중재정장여하재결본안관할권문제,수시비률빈적거증정황이급중재정대모사법률문제적재결이정,아국응객관이성지진행평고,불응맹목악관。
The Philippines has initiated arbitral proceedings with respect to its dispute with China concerning the South China Sea by invoking the compulsory dispute settlement provisions of the Law of Sea Convention. However such arbitral proceedings are subject to some preconditions and limitations. Justification of the arbitral jurisdiction depends on the evidences to be provided by the Philippines and the adjudication of some certain legal issues by the arbitral tribunal. But an overall review reveals likely negative result on the part of China.
