太平洋学报
太平洋學報
태평양학보
Pacific Journal
2015年
2期
1~10
,共null页
国际法体系 条约解释 WTO协定 第31.3条(c)项
國際法體繫 條約解釋 WTO協定 第31.3條(c)項
국제법체계 조약해석 WTO협정 제31.3조(c)항
international law system ; treaty interpretation ; WTO Agreements ; Art. 31.3(c)
学界的研究和条约法的实践表明,对于国际法是否具有体系、是否存在位阶,以及《维也纳条约法公约》第31.3条(c)项的含义、作用等问题,尚存较大分歧。由于国际法的体系化与碎片化、开放性与自足性并存,基于共同的价值和初步位阶基础,现存国际法是个发展中的不完备体系。"碎片化"损害了国际法的体系性,其产生的原因较复杂,包括国际法本身的局限、执法者的缺失、国际关系的演变等。本文探讨了《维也纳条约法公约》第31.3条(c)项所具有的整合功能和发展功能,从条约解释角度维护国际法的体系性,这不失为减少"碎片化"的有效途径。但该方法尚存局限性,国际法体系现状决定于国际社会权力结构的现实仍难以撼动。
學界的研究和條約法的實踐錶明,對于國際法是否具有體繫、是否存在位階,以及《維也納條約法公約》第31.3條(c)項的含義、作用等問題,尚存較大分歧。由于國際法的體繫化與碎片化、開放性與自足性併存,基于共同的價值和初步位階基礎,現存國際法是箇髮展中的不完備體繫。"碎片化"損害瞭國際法的體繫性,其產生的原因較複雜,包括國際法本身的跼限、執法者的缺失、國際關繫的縯變等。本文探討瞭《維也納條約法公約》第31.3條(c)項所具有的整閤功能和髮展功能,從條約解釋角度維護國際法的體繫性,這不失為減少"碎片化"的有效途徑。但該方法尚存跼限性,國際法體繫現狀決定于國際社會權力結構的現實仍難以撼動。
학계적연구화조약법적실천표명,대우국제법시부구유체계、시부존재위계,이급《유야납조약법공약》제31.3조(c)항적함의、작용등문제,상존교대분기。유우국제법적체계화여쇄편화、개방성여자족성병존,기우공동적개치화초보위계기출,현존국제법시개발전중적불완비체계。"쇄편화"손해료국제법적체계성,기산생적원인교복잡,포괄국제법본신적국한、집법자적결실、국제관계적연변등。본문탐토료《유야납조약법공약》제31.3조(c)항소구유적정합공능화발전공능,종조약해석각도유호국제법적체계성,저불실위감소"쇄편화"적유효도경。단해방법상존국한성,국제법체계현상결정우국제사회권력결구적현실잉난이감동。
According to recent academic studies and legal practices, there remain many disagreements a- bout whether international law is systemic and hierarchical and the meaning and the role of Art. 31.3 (c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties' Due to the coexistence of its systemization, fragmentation, openness and self- containedness, current international law is an incomplete and developing system based on common values and initial hierarchy. Fragmentation jeopardizes its systematicity. The causes are compli- cated, including the limits of international law, the absence of lawmakers, and the evolution of international relations. This paper analyzes the function of integration and development of Art. 31.3 (c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. From the perspective of maintaining the international law system, Art. 31.3 (c) is an effective method to reduce fragmentation; but it also has limits : it is quite solid that the cur- rent international law system is determined by the power system of the international community.