CAJ | 학술논문

以世界公认的QS和《泰晤士高等教育》世界大学排名为基本分析框架，观察最近四年（2011—2014年）的排名情况，并对“世界一流大学”进行界定。同时，以北京大学、清华大学为代表对中国顶尖高校各项指标得分与世界一流大学进行对比分析，发现两所高校国际顶尖研究成果缺乏，国际化比例和层次较低，世界范围内学术声誉还需提高，雇主评价和产业收入在考虑国别因素情况下优势明显。要建设世界一流大学，中国内地高校还要完善科学研究激励机制，提升国际化的程度和质量，制定符合高校实际的学科发展规划，建立高校数据信息决策支持系统等。
이세계공인적QS화《태오사고등교육》세계대학배명위기본분석광가，관찰최근사년（2011—2014년）적배명정황，병대“세계일류대학”진행계정。동시，이북경대학、청화대학위대표대중국정첨고교각항지표득분여세계일류대학진행대비분석，발현량소고교국제정첨연구성과결핍，국제화비례화층차교저，세계범위내학술성예환수제고，고주평개화산업수입재고필국별인소정황하우세명현。요건설세계일류대학，중국내지고교환요완선과학연구격려궤제，제승국제화적정도화질량，제정부합고교실제적학과발전규화，건립고교수거신식결책지지계통등。
With the basic analytical framework of world-recognized Qs and ＂Times Higher Education＂ world university rankings, ＂world-class universities＂ can be defined tentatively by the last four years （2011 to 2014） of ranking data. Peking University and Tsinghua University, as the representatives of Chinese top universities, are compared with those world-class universities in every indicator. The comparative analysis shows that both universities lag behind in eminent international research results, the level and range of internationalization and worldwide academic reputation, while have great performance in reputation and industry income, taking national factors into account. To achieve world-class level, universities in the mainland of China should improve the research incentive mechanism, enhance the level and quality of internationalization, formulate discipline development plans according to practical situations, and establish university data systems for information and decision support.