CAJ | 학술논문

2013年9月公布的《关于办理利用网络实施诽谤等刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》专门就网络中出现的诽谤、寻衅滋事等刑事案件法律适用进行了详尽规定,体现了我国法律的价值取向和刑法的谦抑性。但《解释》中的相关问题需要进一步明确：＂转发次数＂的规定符合实际;＂转发＂的认定需结合其自身特点及诽谤罪的构成判断;要注意其中关于＂二年内曾因诽谤受过行政处罚,又诽谤他人的＂规定;对于编造虚假信息在网上散布起哄闹事可入罪的考量,主要是网络社会与公共场所的博弈和网络危害可折射为现实危害的探究。
2013년9월공포적《관우판리이용망락실시비방등형사안건괄용법률약간문제적해석》전문취망락중출현적비방、심흔자사등형사안건법률괄용진행료상진규정,체현료아국법률적개치취향화형법적겸억성。단《해석》중적상관문제수요진일보명학：＂전발차수＂적규정부합실제;＂전발＂적인정수결합기자신특점급비방죄적구성판단;요주의기중관우＂이년내증인비방수과행정처벌,우비방타인적＂규정;대우편조허가신식재망상산포기홍료사가입죄적고량,주요시망락사회여공공장소적박혁화망락위해가절사위현실위해적탐구。
In September, 2013, the Supreme Court and the Supreme Procuratorate issued the judicial interpretation on dealing with criminal cases of using network to commit defamation and affray. This interpretation specialized in providing defamation and affray appearing on the Internet, which embodied the values of our law and the modesty of Criminal code. But some problems now are still needed to be defined. For example, the provision of frequency of retransmission ought to consist with reality; the identification of retransmission must combine with its characteristic and the constitutive require- ment of crime of defamation; the provision of defaming others when having been punished by administrative penalty twice due to defamation need to be highlighted ; Plus, it needs considering and discussing whether to criminalize the behavior of compiling false information and creating disturbances online, we should pay more attention to exploring the game between network society and public places and whether or not the damage can be reflected to the reality.