CAJ | 학술논문

以语言学领域核心期刊《当代语言学》和Journal of Pragmatics中选取的文章为语料建立相应的英汉语料库。依据胡壮麟提出的可证性理论修正模式,就据素频率及种类分布,对英汉语言学学术语篇中的可证性特点进行了探讨。研究发现：（1）在英汉语言学学术语篇中,言据性存在显著性差异;（2）不同的语用策略使得两种语言在言据性特征上存在明显差异。在英语语言中,作者更倾向于直接选取语用策略和条件假设策略,而汉语语言作者更多地选取间接语用策略;（3）英汉语言学学术语篇中据素使用存在相似性,即传闻、演绎和归纳据素使用比例较高,而预期、信度和信念据素使用偏低;（4）言据性与学术语篇特点密切相关。
이어언학영역핵심기간《당대어언학》화Journal of Pragmatics중선취적문장위어료건립상응적영한어료고。의거호장린제출적가증성이론수정모식,취거소빈솔급충류분포,대영한어언학학술어편중적가증성특점진행료탐토。연구발현：（1）재영한어언학학술어편중,언거성존재현저성차이;（2）불동적어용책략사득량충어언재언거성특정상존재명현차이。재영어어언중,작자경경향우직접선취어용책략화조건가설책략,이한어어언작자경다지선취간접어용책략;（3）영한어언학학술어편중거소사용존재상사성,즉전문、연역화귀납거소사용비례교고,이예기、신도화신념거소사용편저;（4）언거성여학술어편특점밀절상관。
The paper makes comparative study on evidentiality in Chinese and English linguistic academic discourses on the basis of Hu＇ s Model of Evidentflaity. The corpora include selected theses from core journals, Contemporary Linguis- tics and Generals ofPragmatics, in the field of linguistics. The findings are：（ 1 ） Evidentiality varies significantly in Chi- nese and English linguistic academic discourses; （2） Different pragmatic strategies lead to significant differences in evi- dentiality. In English, the authors tend to direct pragmatic strategy and conditional assumption strategy, while Chinese authors incline indirect pragmatic strategy; （3） There exist evidential similarities in Chinese and English hnguistic aca- demic discourses, that is, hearsay, induction, deduction evidentials show high distribution frequency but that of belief, expectation, evidentials are low in both languages; （4） Evidentiality do have relationship with academic discourses.