科技进步与对策
科技進步與對策
과기진보여대책
Science & Technology Progress and Policy
2015年
5期
59~63
,共null页
LED产业 协同创新模式 产业基地 比较研究 案例研究
LED產業 協同創新模式 產業基地 比較研究 案例研究
LED산업 협동창신모식 산업기지 비교연구 안례연구
LED Industry; Collaborative Innovation Model; Industrial Base; Comparative Study; Case Study
基于产业集群协同创新理论,以战略—组织—知识为框架,对深圳、上海和南昌3地的LED产业基地协同创新模式的形成机制和特征进行比较分析,发现深圳实行政府与市场良性互动模式,上海实行科研院所主导模式,南昌实行龙头企业主导模式。上述模式为中国其它地区LED产业的协同创新提供理论指导和政策建议。
基于產業集群協同創新理論,以戰略—組織—知識為框架,對深圳、上海和南昌3地的LED產業基地協同創新模式的形成機製和特徵進行比較分析,髮現深圳實行政府與市場良性互動模式,上海實行科研院所主導模式,南昌實行龍頭企業主導模式。上述模式為中國其它地區LED產業的協同創新提供理論指導和政策建議。
기우산업집군협동창신이론,이전략—조직—지식위광가,대심수、상해화남창3지적LED산업기지협동창신모식적형성궤제화특정진행비교분석,발현심수실행정부여시장량성호동모식,상해실행과연원소주도모식,남창실행룡두기업주도모식。상술모식위중국기타지구LED산업적협동창신제공이론지도화정책건의。
Based on the collaborative innovation theory of industry cluster, this article makes a comparative study of collaborative innovation models of 3 LED industrial bases in Shenzhen, Shanghai and Nanchang. It analyses the formation conditions and features of these collaborative innovation models. It indicates that the collaborative innovation model of Shenzhen is ＂benign interaction between government and markets＂ model, Shanghai＇s is ITRI oriented model, and Nanchang＇s is corporate champions oriented model, each of these 3 models has their own features. The comparative analysis of 3 collaborative innovation models will provide theory and policy recommendations of collaborative innovation for other parts of LED industry in China.
