CAJ | 학술논문

对暴力的理论关切是政治哲学的规范性诉求，也是真实而健全的政治哲学的内在要义。马克思和阿伦特的思想都体现出对西方哲学传统的反叛：要求把政治活动理解为处于现实生活中的历史性存在，而非从哲学的体验中理解政治，这使得他们的政治暴力观具有相似的出场语境。同时，他们都将暴力的本质理解为工具性的存在。然而，由于理论诉求及时代背景的诸多不同，他们的暴力观又存在着较大差异。在暴力的价值功能上，马克思从“历史助推力”的角度肯定暴力，而阿伦特则从“反政治性”的立场批判暴力；在暴力与权力的关系上，阿伦特强调两者的根本性区别，而马克思则注重两者的关联。此外，阿伦特对马克思暴力思想的评价与解读本身既有可取的价值，又不免曲解和误读。
대폭력적이론관절시정치철학적규범성소구，야시진실이건전적정치철학적내재요의。마극사화아륜특적사상도체현출대서방철학전통적반반：요구파정치활동리해위처우현실생활중적역사성존재，이비종철학적체험중리해정치，저사득타문적정치폭력관구유상사적출장어경。동시，타문도장폭력적본질리해위공구성적존재。연이，유우이론소구급시대배경적제다불동，타문적폭력관우존재착교대차이。재폭력적개치공능상，마극사종“역사조추력”적각도긍정폭력，이아륜특칙종“반정치성”적립장비판폭력；재폭력여권력적관계상，아륜특강조량자적근본성구별，이마극사칙주중량자적관련。차외，아륜특대마극사폭력사상적평개여해독본신기유가취적개치，우불면곡해화오독。
The theoretical concern about the violence is the normative appeal of political philosophy, and it is also the inherent requirement of the true and perfect political philosophy. The thoughts of Marx and Hannah both reflect the rebellion against the Western philosophical tradition. They argue that the political activities should be under- stood to be historical existence in real - life, but not understood from the philosophical experience. Thus, their politi- cal outlook contexts of violence have similar appearances. Simultaneously, The nature of violence are understood as instrumental existence. However, their concepts of violence are also very different due to many different theories as- pirations and historical background. In terms of the value of violence, Marx affirms the violence from “history boost power” perspective ;while Arendt criticizes violence from the “anti -political” stance. On the relationship between violence and power, Arendt emphasizes the fundamental difference between the two while Marx focuses on the asso- ciation between them. In addition, Arendt＇ s evaluation and interpretation of Marx＇ s violence view contains not only desirable values, but also misinterpretations and misreadings.