CAJ | 학술논문

以“实践”为关键词的“中国·实践·管理”论坛对“直面中国管理实践”（简称“直面”）进行了较有意义、较为全面、较为系统的价值探索。基于“直面”的时代背景、论坛的相关研究成果与发展脉络,尝试对“直面”的历程进行总结、反思与展望：认为在未来“直面”时,“实践学者”、论坛与“基金委”管理科学部应该厘清中国管理实践的研究范畴与边界,更加辩证地看待中国传统文化对“直面”乃至中国管理学健康发展的促进作用,同时也需要回归管理研究的本质,避免“直面”研究走进新时期下的管理丛林。
이“실천”위관건사적“중국·실천·관리”론단대“직면중국관리실천”（간칭“직면”）진행료교유의의、교위전면、교위계통적개치탐색。기우“직면”적시대배경、론단적상관연구성과여발전맥락,상시대“직면”적역정진행총결、반사여전망：인위재미래“직면”시,“실천학자”、론단여“기금위”관이과학부응해전청중국관리실천적연구범주여변계,경가변증지간대중국전통문화대“직면”내지중국관이학건강발전적촉진작용,동시야수요회귀관리연구적본질,피면“직면”연구주진신시기하적관리총림。
The ＂Chi word of Practice, has search on ＂Facing the C na, Practice and Management＂ symposium, which is characterized by the key ready valuably explored a lot of meaningful, comprehensive and systematic re hinese Management Practice＂. So how have ＂the scholars of practice＂ investi gated this topic？ What is their consensus？ Has ＂Facing the Chinese Management Practice＂ got closer to Chinese management practices？ Although NSFC, the symposium as well as ＂the scholars of prac- tice＂ are all focusing on ＂Facing the Chinese Management Practice＂, have their efforts been based on the nature of management research？ Is it possible that ＂Facing the Chinese Management Practice＂ is lending its way to the ＂Management Jungle＂ under the new era？ Based on these questions and related research achievements and development paths of the ＂China, Practice and Management＂ symposium, this study will try to make retrospection, reflection and prospection on ＂Facing the Chinese Manage ment Practice＂, wishing to initiate more discusses on this topic and hoping to contribute to the healthy and scientific development of the research on Chinese management practices.