CAJ | 학술논문

对我国大陆地区犯罪参与体系归属的证成需要从解释论与立法论两个维度展开。在解释论上，我国学界形成了“单一制说”“区分制说”与“既非单一又非区分制说”三种观点。“既非单一又非区分制说”没有把握犯罪参与体系的本质，不具有妥当性。“单一制说”与“区分制说”在现有的刑法体系下均能够自圆其说，不违反罪刑法定原则。在立法论上，单一制与区分制的价值比较以犯罪论和刑罚论为核心。在犯罪论的功能评价上，二者平分秋色。但是单一制缺少规范化的量刑准据，难以确保法律适用的平等性。就我国现实状况而言，采用单一正犯体系的效果弊大于利，正犯与共犯区分体系依然值得提倡。
대아국대륙지구범죄삼여체계귀속적증성수요종해석론여입법론량개유도전개。재해석론상，아국학계형성료“단일제설”“구분제설”여“기비단일우비구분제설”삼충관점。“기비단일우비구분제설”몰유파악범죄삼여체계적본질，불구유타당성。“단일제설”여“구분제설”재현유적형법체계하균능구자원기설，불위반죄형법정원칙。재입법론상，단일제여구분제적개치비교이범죄론화형벌론위핵심。재범죄론적공능평개상，이자평분추색。단시단일제결소규범화적양형준거，난이학보법률괄용적평등성。취아국현실상황이언，채용단일정범체계적효과폐대우리，정범여공범구분체계의연치득제창。
About the debate of the complicity system of the Chinese Criminal Law, there are three kinds of the- ory, the Principal and Accomplice Offender Theory, the Unitary Principal Offender Theory and the New Type Theory. People who support the New Type Theory cannot learn about the essential differences between the Principal and Accomplice Offender and the Unitary complicity system theories will be helpful to choose Principal Offender. In a word, explaining the value of the above the Principal and Accomplice Offender Theory and the Unitary Principal Offender Theory. To study the value of the complicity system, it will be explained in four aspects, the constitutive requirement, the protecting rechtsgueter principle, personal liability principle and the measurement of penalty. The Principal and Accomplice Offender is better than the Unitary Principal Offender in the respect of the measurement of penalty. And it will be harmful to the judicial practice if there lack the ways of measurement of penalty when the lawmaker adopts the Unitary Principal Offender. In conclusio Principal and Accomplice Offender is worth of being adopted in the legislation of the complicity system Chinese Criminal Law. n, the of the Chinese Criminal Law.