CAJ | 학술논문

从文献、实物、考古三个方面论证张三丰与太极拳没有关系。通过文献考证认为，张三丰的籍贯、名字号、体貌特征以及生活习惯与太极拳创立没有关系；张三丰道教思想与太极拳创立没有关系，张三丰是道教理论家和实践者，但并不是太极拳的创始人；明朝皇帝寻求张三丰的踪迹与太极拳创立没有关系；张三丰治病仙方与太极拳创立没有关系；张三丰仙游行迹与太极拳创立没有关系。通过研究分析主要实物之《张三丰遗迹记》碑内容可知，无论是记载张三丰的籍贯、行迹、与人交往，还是记载明成祖派人寻访张三丰其人，都未看出张三丰在太极拳或内家拳上有任何建树。从碑文记载内容可证，张三丰与太极拳不发生任何关系；从明清时期流传下来关于张三丰的大量遗物、遗迹、遗诗等证据链分析可证，张三丰与太极拳没有任何关系。通过对《南雷文定·王征南墓志铭》的研究认为，太极拳附会神仙张三丰是从内家拳附会的张三峰移植过来的；《三丰全书》中王渔洋摘录的所谓内家拳源流来自于黄宗羲作的《南雷文定·王征南墓志铭》，玄武大帝授拳于张三峰荒唐无稽；从《墓志铭》记载对王宗与王宗岳误传推断宋之张三峰传拳也是附会；无证据证明太极拳就是内家拳，从而推证内家拳或太极拳并非张三峰（丰）所创；移植内家拳的张三峰为太极拳的张三丰，是《三丰全书》出版以后的附会；王宗岳的理论和张三丰没有任何关系，太极拳非张三丰所创。
종문헌、실물、고고삼개방면론증장삼봉여태겁권몰유관계。통과문헌고증인위，장삼봉적적관、명자호、체모특정이급생활습관여태겁권창립몰유관계；장삼봉도교사상여태겁권창립몰유관계，장삼봉시도교이론가화실천자，단병불시태겁권적창시인；명조황제심구장삼봉적종적여태겁권창립몰유관계；장삼봉치병선방여태겁권창립몰유관계；장삼봉선유행적여태겁권창립몰유관계。통과연구분석주요실물지《장삼봉유적기》비내용가지，무론시기재장삼봉적적관、행적、여인교왕，환시기재명성조파인심방장삼봉기인，도미간출장삼봉재태겁권혹내가권상유임하건수。종비문기재내용가증，장삼봉여태겁권불발생임하관계；종명청시기류전하래관우장삼봉적대량유물、유적、유시등증거련분석가증，장삼봉여태겁권몰유임하관계。통과대《남뢰문정·왕정남묘지명》적연구인위，태겁권부회신선장삼봉시종내가권부회적장삼봉이식과래적；《삼봉전서》중왕어양적록적소위내가권원류래자우황종희작적《남뢰문정·왕정남묘지명》，현무대제수권우장삼봉황당무계；종《묘지명》기재대왕종여왕종악오전추단송지장삼봉전권야시부회；무증거증명태겁권취시내가권，종이추증내가권혹태겁권병비장삼봉（봉）소창；이식내가권적장삼봉위태겁권적장삼봉，시《삼봉전서》출판이후적부회；왕종악적이론화장삼봉몰유임하관계，태겁권비장삼봉소창。
Literature, material and archaeological study showed that Zhang Sanfeng bore no relation to the creation of Tai- jiquan. Literature study proved that Zhang Sanfeng＇s birth place, name, physical features and living habits bore no rela- tion to the creation of Taijiquan. Neither did his Taoist ideas. He was a Taoist theorist and practitioner instead of the cre- ator of Taijiquan. The pursuit of the Emperor of the Ming Dynasty of Zhang Sanfeng did not mean that Zhang was the cre- ator of Taijiquan. His travelling experiences was not related to the creation of Taijiquan. It could be concluded either from TheRemains of Zhang Sanfeng or from his birth place, movements, his associations with other people, or from the or- der of the Emperor Cheng of Ming in search of Zhang that Zhang was not related to Taijiquan. It could be proved from the great quantities of remains about Zhang Sanfeng left from Ming and Qing Dynasties that there was no relation between Zhang and the creation of Taijiquan. The studies on Wang Zhengnan＇ Epitaph held that the far-fetched analogy of Tai- jiquan to the supernatural being Zhangsanfeng imitated the far-fetched analogy of Internal Boxing to Zhang Sanfeng. WangYuyang＇s extracts in The Complete Works of Zhang Sanfeng revealded that Internal Boxing originates from Wang Zhengnan＇s Epitaph and it was absurd that Emperor Xuanwu taught Zhang Sanl＇eng boxing. It could be inferred l＇rom the recording about Wang Zong and Wang Zongyue in Wang Zhengnan＇s Epitaph that Internal Boxing or Tai- jiquan was not created by Zhang Sannfeng, and that Wang Zongyue＇s theories had nothing to do with Zhang Sanl.eng and Taijiquan was not created by Zhang Sannfeng.