教育与经济
教育與經濟
교육여경제
Education & Economy
2015年
1期
29~36
,共null页
文凭效应 个人教育收益 劳动力市场 工作经历
文憑效應 箇人教育收益 勞動力市場 工作經歷
문빙효응 개인교육수익 노동력시장 공작경력
diploma effects; personal returns of education; labor market; work experience
利用2008年全国综合调查数据,本研究考察并计量了1978-2008年我国各级教育个人收益中的文凭效应,并对不同劳动力市场及工作经历下的文凭效应进行了比较分析。研究发现,我国个人教育收益中存在显著的文凭效应,高中、大专以及本科毕业的文凭效应分别为29.6%、27.6%、35.3%;个人教育收益率存在不连续跳跃现象,受教育的第13年的收益率增幅最大,第16年的收益率最高;各级教育的文凭效应在次要劳动力市场并不明显,大专和本科教育的文凭效应在主要劳动力市场显著;工作经历对文凭效应具有调节作用,降低了较低层级和提高了较高层级教育的文凭效应。本研究发现对国家教育经济政策和学生个人的教育选择具有参考价值。
利用2008年全國綜閤調查數據,本研究攷察併計量瞭1978-2008年我國各級教育箇人收益中的文憑效應,併對不同勞動力市場及工作經歷下的文憑效應進行瞭比較分析。研究髮現,我國箇人教育收益中存在顯著的文憑效應,高中、大專以及本科畢業的文憑效應分彆為29.6%、27.6%、35.3%;箇人教育收益率存在不連續跳躍現象,受教育的第13年的收益率增幅最大,第16年的收益率最高;各級教育的文憑效應在次要勞動力市場併不明顯,大專和本科教育的文憑效應在主要勞動力市場顯著;工作經歷對文憑效應具有調節作用,降低瞭較低層級和提高瞭較高層級教育的文憑效應。本研究髮現對國傢教育經濟政策和學生箇人的教育選擇具有參攷價值。
이용2008년전국종합조사수거,본연구고찰병계량료1978-2008년아국각급교육개인수익중적문빙효응,병대불동노동력시장급공작경력하적문빙효응진행료비교분석。연구발현,아국개인교육수익중존재현저적문빙효응,고중、대전이급본과필업적문빙효응분별위29.6%、27.6%、35.3%;개인교육수익솔존재불련속도약현상,수교육적제13년적수익솔증폭최대,제16년적수익솔최고;각급교육적문빙효응재차요노동력시장병불명현,대전화본과교육적문빙효응재주요노동력시장현저;공작경력대문빙효응구유조절작용,강저료교저층급화제고료교고층급교육적문빙효응。본연구발현대국가교육경제정책화학생개인적교육선택구유삼고개치。
With the date from the"2008 Chinese General Social Survey"(CGSS 2008), this paper has investigated the diploma effects in the returns to education in China, and a comparative analysis was used to explore the diploma effects under different labor markets and work experience. Firstly, it finds that the diploma effects lies in the personal return of education significantly, namely, diploma effects of completing senior high school, junior college and university are relatively29.6%, 27.6% and 35.3%. Secondly, a discontinuous jump can be found on the rate of personal return of education, namely,in the 13 th year of schooling, particularly, the growth of personal return of education reaches its uppermost level; the highest level of personal return of education occurs in the 16 th year altogether. Thirdly, there are no distinct differences of the diploma effects in secondary labor market, but the diploma effects of completing junior college and undergraduate education are relatively obvious in primary labor market. Besides, the diploma effects can be adjusted by work experience, reducing the diploma effects in the low level of education, while increasing the effects in the upper level of education. It suggests that the findings, to a certain extent, can be referred to the decision making in educational and economic policies as well as personal choice in education participation.