教育与经济
教育與經濟
교육여경제
Education & Economy
2015年
1期
37~43
,共null页
普通高校 基础设施 效用偏差 供给逻辑
普通高校 基礎設施 效用偏差 供給邏輯
보통고교 기출설시 효용편차 공급라집
regular higher school; infrastructure; utility deviation; supply logic
1999年开始的大学扩招进程中,普通高等学校面临"基础设施效用不彰"的问题。以学生类校舍的生均面积及其"标杆值"为基础,以各学生类校舍的"效用偏差"为分析对象,采用熵值法测算了八类校舍"效用偏差"的权重,评价了扩招以来各年度学生类校舍的效用总偏差。研究发现:八种学生类校舍的"效用偏差"可以区分为"保健型"指标、"激励型"指标和"中间型"指标三种类型;扩招以来的学生类校舍综合效用处于"不彰"甚至一定程度的"倒退"状态。研究结论是:第一,政府对普通高校基础设施缺乏有力的宏观调控;第二,普通高校打了一场后勤保障投入失当的"扩招之战"但面临提高学生类校舍综合效用的"重要机遇期";第三,普通高校具有实现组织利益最大化的倾向;第四,普通高校在基础设施供给方面体现了"赶牛式"行政的特征,且形成了一定程度的"投入惯性效应"。
1999年開始的大學擴招進程中,普通高等學校麵臨"基礎設施效用不彰"的問題。以學生類校捨的生均麵積及其"標桿值"為基礎,以各學生類校捨的"效用偏差"為分析對象,採用熵值法測算瞭八類校捨"效用偏差"的權重,評價瞭擴招以來各年度學生類校捨的效用總偏差。研究髮現:八種學生類校捨的"效用偏差"可以區分為"保健型"指標、"激勵型"指標和"中間型"指標三種類型;擴招以來的學生類校捨綜閤效用處于"不彰"甚至一定程度的"倒退"狀態。研究結論是:第一,政府對普通高校基礎設施缺乏有力的宏觀調控;第二,普通高校打瞭一場後勤保障投入失噹的"擴招之戰"但麵臨提高學生類校捨綜閤效用的"重要機遇期";第三,普通高校具有實現組織利益最大化的傾嚮;第四,普通高校在基礎設施供給方麵體現瞭"趕牛式"行政的特徵,且形成瞭一定程度的"投入慣性效應"。
1999년개시적대학확초진정중,보통고등학교면림"기출설시효용불창"적문제。이학생류교사적생균면적급기"표간치"위기출,이각학생류교사적"효용편차"위분석대상,채용적치법측산료팔류교사"효용편차"적권중,평개료확초이래각년도학생류교사적효용총편차。연구발현:팔충학생류교사적"효용편차"가이구분위"보건형"지표、"격려형"지표화"중간형"지표삼충류형;확초이래적학생류교사종합효용처우"불창"심지일정정도적"도퇴"상태。연구결론시:제일,정부대보통고교기출설시결핍유력적굉관조공;제이,보통고교타료일장후근보장투입실당적"확초지전"단면림제고학생류교사종합효용적"중요궤우기";제삼,보통고교구유실현조직이익최대화적경향;제사,보통고교재기출설시공급방면체현료"간우식"행정적특정,차형성료일정정도적"투입관성효응"。
Since the enrollment expansion of colleges in 1999,,regular higher schools have faced the problem of"ineffectiveness of infrastructure ".Taking the mean space of regular higher schools' housing for students and its benchmark values as the analysis bases, analyzing the utility deviation of students' schoolhouses, and using the entropy method to measure the index weights of utility deviation in the eight kinds of students' schoolhouses, to make a comprehensive evaluation of the utility deviation of schoolhouses inthe years since the enrollment expansion. The study finds that eight indicators of utility deviation can be divided into "health-based" indicator, "incentive " indicator and "intermediate" indicator; Besides, the utility of schools' housing for students is not going well and is in a "back-wards" state to some extent since the 1999 of enrollment. This shows that first of all, the government is lack of effective macrocontrol to the infrastructure of regular higher schools; Second, regular higher schools have an improper performance on the input of logistic support in the enrollment expansion, but facing the"important opportunity"to improve the comprehensive utility of students' schoolhouses.. Third, there is a tendency on regular higher schools to realize the maximization of group interests; Fourth, regular higher schools have showed the administrative characteristics of"herding-cattle-style", and formed the"input inertia effect"to some degree.