CAJ | 학술논문

我国当前有关立法和司法实践所确立的被告住所地一般管辖规则和侵权行为地特殊管辖规则,可继续适用于网络侵权争议管辖权的确定,但在司法实践中因为没有充分认识到网络侵权争议案件的复杂性,将场所化理念与多元分析要素切实注入管辖权分析之中,特别是在立法上也缺乏有关诽谤等人格侵权与知识产权侵权管辖权行使的特殊规定。我国的涉外网络侵权管辖权的立法和司法实践,有待在矫正传统被告住所地和侵权行为地管辖规则的基础上,通过注入以合理预见、利益中心、关联争议集中管辖等分析要素进一步予以考察重构。因信息网络传播所引起的侵权争议,侵权行为地法院管辖权的行使,应确立在有关争议与受案法院地存在紧密联系的基础之上,除非没有其他行使管辖权的可能,受案法院不能仅以有关侵权行为发生在该地为受理案件的唯一根据。
아국당전유관입법화사법실천소학립적피고주소지일반관할규칙화침권행위지특수관할규칙,가계속괄용우망락침권쟁의관할권적학정,단재사법실천중인위몰유충분인식도망락침권쟁의안건적복잡성,장장소화이념여다원분석요소절실주입관할권분석지중,특별시재입법상야결핍유관비방등인격침권여지식산권침권관할권행사적특수규정。아국적섭외망락침권관할권적입법화사법실천,유대재교정전통피고주소지화침권행위지관할규칙적기출상,통과주입이합리예견、이익중심、관련쟁의집중관할등분석요소진일보여이고찰중구。인신식망락전파소인기적침권쟁의,침권행위지법원관할권적행사,응학립재유관쟁의여수안법원지존재긴밀련계적기출지상,제비몰유기타행사관할권적가능,수안법원불능부이유관침권행위발생재해지위수리안건적유일근거。
Though China contemporary legal and practice of jurisdiction frame composed of general jurisdiction debased on the defendant domicile and specific jurisdiction for tort debased on the place of tort can continue applicable to internet related tort disputes,due to the lack full realized the complex of dispute resolution of internet tort,the court practice does not put the localization analysis and multilateral analysis factors into the jurisdiction analysis process. Even more,there is no special jurisdiction rule in defamation and other injury to rights of personality and intellectual property,besides the traditional jurisdiction criteria of domicile and the place where the harmful event occurred should be adapted,the legal and court practice of China foreign related Internet tort jurisdiction system demands reconsideration and restatement be based on the major factors of reasonable analysis,interest focused and related actions under single procedure. While matters concerns Internet related tort,the jurisdiction of the place where the harmful event occurred or may occur,should be based on close contact between the seized court and the concerning dispute,unless there is the other accessible jurisdictional court,otherwise the harmful event occurred should not be taken as the only jurisdiction basis.