CAJ | 학술논문

长期以来,国家从国际协定和国际组织单边退出的现象为大多数法律学者所忽视。大部分国际法的学术文献倾向于谴责退出法律的行为。但是,在很多情形下,退出国际法是可取的。本文运用阿尔伯特·赫希曼传统上用以衡量公司或政治组织衰败的＂退出、呼吁和忠诚＂框架,以说明退出国际法的理由在于,事实上从利用退出选项的可能性中获益的国家可在全球化进程中赢得更大的发言权,并可能在不断变化世界中为促进国际法和国际组织的效率和适应性提供一条快捷路径。
장기이래,국가종국제협정화국제조직단변퇴출적현상위대다수법률학자소홀시。대부분국제법적학술문헌경향우견책퇴출법률적행위。단시,재흔다정형하,퇴출국제법시가취적。본문운용아이백특·혁희만전통상용이형량공사혹정치조직쇠패적＂퇴출、호우화충성＂광가,이설명퇴출국제법적이유재우,사실상종이용퇴출선항적가능성중획익적국가가재전구화진정중영득경대적발언권,병가능재불단변화세계중위촉진국제법화국제조직적효솔화괄응성제공일조쾌첩로경。
The phenomenon of countries unilateral exit from international agreements and international organizations has been overlooked by most legal scholars for long. In most academic literature on international law,there is a tendency to condemn exit from law. However,a variety of circumstances arise under which the exit from international law is desirable.This article employs Albert Hirschman＇s framework of ＂ exit,voice,and loyalty＂,traditionally used to measure the decline of a firm or polity,to illustrate the reason for the exit from international law is that countries those benefit from the availability of actual exit options would gain more voice in the process of globalization and may offer a short route toward facilitating the efficiency and adaptability of international law and international organizations in an ever-changing world.