西部论坛
西部論罈
서부론단
West Forum
2015年
2期
90~99
,共null页
铸币税 电子货币 虚拟货币 基础货币 货币需求 通货膨胀率 名义利率 政府资产 财政政策 准备金制度
鑄幣稅 電子貨幣 虛擬貨幣 基礎貨幣 貨幣需求 通貨膨脹率 名義利率 政府資產 財政政策 準備金製度
주폐세 전자화폐 허의화폐 기출화폐 화폐수구 통화팽창솔 명의리솔 정부자산 재정정책 준비금제도
Seigniorage ; electronic currency; virtual currency ; Monetary Base ; currency demand ; inflation rate ; nominal interest rate; government assets; financial policy; Reserve Fund system
由于电子货币对现金和活期存款的取代,无论采取哪种铸币税定义,电子货币的发行和流通都会导致铸币税减少;不同类型虚拟货币对铸币税有不同的影响,类型Ⅰ不会影响央行的铸币税,类型Ⅱ会减少央行的铸币税,类型Ⅲ和类型Ⅳ对铸币税的影响取决于其对现实世界货币需求的降低效应与增加效应的相对强弱;如果流通中的现金完全被电子货币和虚拟货币取代,则G10平均将损失34.59%的铸币税(2001年数据),而中国将损失31.67%的铸币税(2013年数据),但损失的铸币税占GDP的比例较低。电子货币和虚拟货币是货币发展的未来形态,任何禁止电子货币和虚拟货币的措施都是不明智的;但应采取措施(如建立电子货币、虚拟货币发行准备金制度)减轻电子货币、虚拟货币对现金和活期存款的替代,从而减轻电子货币和虚拟货币对铸币税以及财政政策的影响。
由于電子貨幣對現金和活期存款的取代,無論採取哪種鑄幣稅定義,電子貨幣的髮行和流通都會導緻鑄幣稅減少;不同類型虛擬貨幣對鑄幣稅有不同的影響,類型Ⅰ不會影響央行的鑄幣稅,類型Ⅱ會減少央行的鑄幣稅,類型Ⅲ和類型Ⅳ對鑄幣稅的影響取決于其對現實世界貨幣需求的降低效應與增加效應的相對彊弱;如果流通中的現金完全被電子貨幣和虛擬貨幣取代,則G10平均將損失34.59%的鑄幣稅(2001年數據),而中國將損失31.67%的鑄幣稅(2013年數據),但損失的鑄幣稅佔GDP的比例較低。電子貨幣和虛擬貨幣是貨幣髮展的未來形態,任何禁止電子貨幣和虛擬貨幣的措施都是不明智的;但應採取措施(如建立電子貨幣、虛擬貨幣髮行準備金製度)減輕電子貨幣、虛擬貨幣對現金和活期存款的替代,從而減輕電子貨幣和虛擬貨幣對鑄幣稅以及財政政策的影響。
유우전자화폐대현금화활기존관적취대,무론채취나충주폐세정의,전자화폐적발행화류통도회도치주폐세감소;불동류형허의화폐대주폐세유불동적영향,류형Ⅰ불회영향앙행적주폐세,류형Ⅱ회감소앙행적주폐세,류형Ⅲ화류형Ⅳ대주폐세적영향취결우기대현실세계화폐수구적강저효응여증가효응적상대강약;여과류통중적현금완전피전자화폐화허의화폐취대,칙G10평균장손실34.59%적주폐세(2001년수거),이중국장손실31.67%적주폐세(2013년수거),단손실적주폐세점GDP적비례교저。전자화폐화허의화폐시화폐발전적미래형태,임하금지전자화폐화허의화폐적조시도시불명지적;단응채취조시(여건립전자화폐、허의화폐발행준비금제도)감경전자화폐、허의화폐대현금화활기존관적체대,종이감경전자화폐화허의화폐대주폐세이급재정정책적영향。
In place of cash and current deposit, the issuance and circulation of electronic currency will result in seigniorage decrease no matter how to define seigniorage. Different types of virtual currency have different influence on seigniorage. Type Ⅰ has no influence on seigniorage of central bank; type Ⅱ cuts seigniorage; the influence of type m and IV depends on the degree of decrease effect and increase effect of its demand for real currency. If the cash in circulation was completely replaced by electronic currency and virtual currency, the G10 would lose 34. 59% (the data of the year 2001 ) of seigniorage on average, and China would lose 31.67% (the data of the year 2013) of seigniorage, but the losing seigniorage is small portion of GDP. Electronic currency and virtual currency are the future forms of currency development, and any measures banning them are unwise, but measures (for example, Reserve Fund System of electronic currency and virtual currency issuance) should be taken to alleviate the replace of cash and current deposit by electronic currency and virtual currency so as to minimize the impact on seigniorage and financial policy by electronic currency and virtual currency.