CAJ | 학술논문

在当今中国司法环境下,在很多待决刑事案件中,律师发表庭外言论成了一种＂诉讼策略＂。本文通过比较法的视野,从法律技术层面探讨了律师庭外言论可能引起的几个具体法律问题,包括：证据法角度的＂律师-客户特免权＂,＂言论自由＂和＂公正审判＂的关系,律师违约和侵权责任,以及诉讼效率问题。通过这种比较分析,本文得到启发,认为律师庭外言论之所以成为一个＂中国问题＂,其根源可能是,中国刑事司法的诉讼规则、司法权威、言论规制的司法审查机制等本身存在问题。
재당금중국사법배경하,재흔다대결형사안건중,률사발표정외언론성료일충＂소송책략＂。본문통과비교법적시야,종법률기술층면탐토료률사정외언론가능인기적궤개구체법률문제,포괄：증거법각도적＂률사-객호특면권＂,＂언론자유＂화＂공정심판＂적관계,률사위약화침권책임,이급소송효솔문제。통과저충비교분석,본문득도계발,인위률사정외언론지소이성위일개＂중국문제＂,기근원가능시,중국형사사법적소송규칙、사법권위、언론규제적사법심사궤제등본신존재문제。
Under the context of today＇s judiciary system of China,in many pending criminal cases,out-court comments became one sort of ＂litigation tactic＂for attorneys. Through studying in the perspective of comparative law,this paper explored several specific legal issues arising from attorneys ＇out- court comments,including the issues of ＂attorney- client privilege＂,the relations between＂freedom of speech＂and＂fair trial＂,the liability of breach and infringement by attorneys and litigation efficiency. Through the comparative analysis,we can obtain inspirations and conclude that the reasons why out- court comments became a problem in China were rooted in the following factors： the imperfection on the proceeding rules of China criminal justice system,the deficiency of judicial authority and the lack of judicial review of the regulation of speech and so on.