知识产权
知識產權
지식산권
Intellectual Property
2015年
3期
14~22
,共null页
商标价值 增殖权益 过失侵权 不真正无因管理
商標價值 增殖權益 過失侵權 不真正無因管理
상표개치 증식권익 과실침권 불진정무인관리
trademark value;-appreciated rights and interests; negligent infringement; non-genuinenegotiorum gestio
IPAD商标案凸显商标侵权使用人能否享有其创造的商标价值增殖权益问题。对此，新商标法无规定，学界无回应，侵权使用人也仅留下“为他人作嫁衣裳”的叹息。经研究发现，故意侵权的商标使用人无权享有其创造的商标增殖权益，但是，善意侵权或过失侵权商标使用人享有该权益具有法理依据。建议我国商标法增加、完善商标使用人享有其创造的商标价值增殖权益的条款。
IPAD商標案凸顯商標侵權使用人能否享有其創造的商標價值增殖權益問題。對此，新商標法無規定，學界無迴應，侵權使用人也僅留下“為他人作嫁衣裳”的歎息。經研究髮現，故意侵權的商標使用人無權享有其創造的商標增殖權益，但是，善意侵權或過失侵權商標使用人享有該權益具有法理依據。建議我國商標法增加、完善商標使用人享有其創造的商標價值增殖權益的條款。
IPAD상표안철현상표침권사용인능부향유기창조적상표개치증식권익문제。대차，신상표법무규정，학계무회응，침권사용인야부류하“위타인작가의상”적우식。경연구발현，고의침권적상표사용인무권향유기창조적상표증식권익，단시，선의침권혹과실침권상표사용인향유해권익구유법리의거。건의아국상표법증가、완선상표사용인향유기창조적상표개치증식권익적조관。
IPAD trademark case concerns whether the trademark infringement user can enjoy the appreciation of the trademark value created by himself. There is neither a provision in new Trademark Law nor a response from academia. The infringement user only can sigh ＂made a wedding dress for others＂. Researches show that the intentional infringement user cannot share the appreciation of the trademark value created by himself However, if the infringement action is innocent or negligent, the user can legitimately share the rights and interests with a legal basis. Thus, this article suggests adding and perfecting the clause in our Trademark Law that the trademark user can share the appreciation value of the trademark created by himself.
