知识产权
知識產權
지식산권
Intellectual Property
2015年
3期
84~91
,共null页
标准必要专利 公平 合理 无歧视许可 禁令 许可费 比较法
標準必要專利 公平 閤理 無歧視許可 禁令 許可費 比較法
표준필요전리 공평 합리 무기시허가 금령 허가비 비교법
standard essential patents; FRAND; ban; royalty rates; comparative method
标准必要专利许可使用纠纷，正成为新技术条件下人们热切关注的重大疑难案件。在国际知识产权领域，各国法院就如何适用FRAND原则解决标准必要专利许可使用纠纷已经展开初步的有益的探索。美国与德国等国家的相关判例大致从合同法、侵权法以及竞争法三条路径来解决诉讼纠纷，其中禁令以及使用许可费的确定往往成为案件焦点问题。禁令救济附加限制条件，许可费率确定必要的考量因素等域外经验，都将为我国今后处理标准必要专利诉讼提供有益的参考。
標準必要專利許可使用糾紛，正成為新技術條件下人們熱切關註的重大疑難案件。在國際知識產權領域，各國法院就如何適用FRAND原則解決標準必要專利許可使用糾紛已經展開初步的有益的探索。美國與德國等國傢的相關判例大緻從閤同法、侵權法以及競爭法三條路徑來解決訴訟糾紛，其中禁令以及使用許可費的確定往往成為案件焦點問題。禁令救濟附加限製條件，許可費率確定必要的攷量因素等域外經驗，都將為我國今後處理標準必要專利訴訟提供有益的參攷。
표준필요전리허가사용규분，정성위신기술조건하인문열절관주적중대의난안건。재국제지식산권영역，각국법원취여하괄용FRAND원칙해결표준필요전리허가사용규분이경전개초보적유익적탐색。미국여덕국등국가적상관판례대치종합동법、침권법이급경쟁법삼조로경래해결소송규분，기중금령이급사용허가비적학정왕왕성위안건초점문제。금령구제부가한제조건，허가비솔학정필요적고량인소등역외경험，도장위아국금후처리표준필요전리소송제공유익적삼고。
Standard essential patents licensing disputes are becoming difficult and complicated cases which are paid close attention by people under conditions of new techniques. In the international field of intellectual property, national courts on how to apply the FRAND principles to solve standard essential patents licensing disputes have already standard preliminary useful exploration. It is worth going comparative study. Overview of the related cases in some countries such as USA and Germany, there are three ways to solve the disputes which are contract law, tort law and competition law, moreover, litigation and licensing fee ban issues often become the common focus of these cases. Through the comparative study, additional restrictions to injunctive relief, royalty rates to determine the necessary considerations and other extraterritorial experience will provide useful references for standard essential oatent litigations in the future for China.
