CAJ | 학술논문

通过介绍以沃特·威尔逊·格雷格爵士为代表的目录派三杰，在对文学文本基本物质形态从手稿到印刷文本辨伪和考证批评的基础上，经过厘定文本讹误和四次重要的学术论战，确立了作者的神圣地位，让文学成为绝对科学化的大学学科，但新目录派最终却退出了现代西方文论思潮。观照几乎同时产生于印刷术所带来的学术分裂期的中国乾嘉派，它能够客观对待经学作者，并形成了系统的治学方法，从而稳步发展为今天的朴学大潮，在此视阈下分析并阐明新目录派无法形成体系的原因，恰在于其过分强调科学权威性而漠视了文学本身的独特因素造成的方枘圆凿，藉此提出中国治学方法借鉴于西方文论批评的可行性。
통과개소이옥특·위이손·격뢰격작사위대표적목록파삼걸，재대문학문본기본물질형태종수고도인쇄문본변위화고증비평적기출상，경과전정문본와오화사차중요적학술론전，학립료작자적신골지위，양문학성위절대과학화적대학학과，단신목록파최종각퇴출료현대서방문론사조。관조궤호동시산생우인쇄술소대래적학술분렬기적중국건가파，타능구객관대대경학작자，병형성료계통적치학방법，종이은보발전위금천적박학대조，재차시역하분석병천명신목록파무법형성체계적원인，흡재우기과분강조과학권위성이막시료문학본신적독특인소조성적방예원착，자차제출중국치학방법차감우서방문론비평적가행성。
The rise of the New Bibliography at the turn of the century of British Empire is in the growth of literature’s set-up as an independent discipline in the British universities.Instead of the compiling of books titles,New Bibliography i-dentified and classified the medieval manuscripts with the printing books in order to assimilate literature study into the scientific frame,which proved not a flawless methodology.In comparison the Confucian textual study mapped by Liang Qichao in the same century may help to reconceptualize the present decline of New Bibliography whose significance still locates as a counterforce against the theoretically impressionistic tendency of literary criticism.