CAJ | 학술논문

为探索情绪刺激如何影响虚假记忆及其在分离虚假记忆与真实记忆神经活动中的作用，以IAPS图片为标准情绪刺激，19名大学生为被试，使用DRM实验范式，从行为、眼动和ERP三个方面进行了联合分析。结果发现，情绪的唤醒度和效价都能促使虚假记忆的产生，只是唤醒度影响时程更早。眼动和ERP的联合分析还发现了在情绪刺激下虚假记忆与真实记忆在神经活动层面上存在差异：早期虚假再认图片比真实再认图片需要更深的加工来实现对目标的识别；晚期虚假再认需要更多的信息搜索、比较等加工来完成其决策行为。
위탐색정서자격여하영향허가기억급기재분리허가기억여진실기억신경활동중적작용，이IAPS도편위표준정서자격，19명대학생위피시，사용DRM실험범식，종행위、안동화ERP삼개방면진행료연합분석。결과발현，정서적환성도화효개도능촉사허가기억적산생，지시환성도영향시정경조。안동화ERP적연합분석환발현료재정서자격하허가기억여진실기억재신경활동층면상존재차이：조기허가재인도편비진실재인도편수요경심적가공래실현대목표적식별；만기허가재인수요경다적신식수색、비교등가공래완성기결책행위。
Emotional stimuli have two opposite effects on memory. On one hand, emotional stimuli improve memory; on the other hand, they induce false memories as well. Much research examined the effects of emotional valence and arousal on false memory, but no consensus has been reached yet. Some researchers found that emotional arousal impacted false memory to a larger degree while others preferred emotional valence. The present study seeks to address this conflict and look into different influences that emotional stimuli would cause on false memory compared to true memory. To the authors＇ knowledge, the controversy of emotional arousal and valence might result from a previous neglect in analyzing temporal components of false memory. The present study hypothesized that emotional stimuli would have different impacts on false memory at different points along its time course. Meanwhile, to understand false memory thoroughly, it＇s necessary to compare it with true memory from both behavioral and neuroscience perspectives. The present study used a within-subjects design and altogether 19 undergraduate students were recruited to participate. The study selected pictures from the International Affective Pictures System （IAPS） as emotional stimuli and used the DRM paradigm. There were 4 kinds of pictures, they were positive-high arousal, positive-low arousal, negative-high arousal and negative-low arousal. Each kind composed 150 pictures and they were divided into 3 groups, such as repeated（both show in study and recall stage）, similar lures（only show in study stage） and new ones（only show in recall stage）. Similar lures were left/right mirror reversals of studied pictures. Another 50 pictures were showed only in study stage. All participants first study pictures ,then do 20 addition tasks, after that recall pictures to decide whether each picture showed in study stage or not. To provide a comprehensive analysis, the present study collected behavioral data, eye movement data and ERP data. ERP data were recorded by ESI-64 system of Neuro Scan and analysised by Scan 4.3.1. Eye movement data were recorded by Tobii 1750, sampling rate were setted as 50 Hz. Results revealed that false memory, as expected, indeed changed across its whole time course. The present study involved altogether four kinds of false memory （i.e., negative-low, negative-high, positive-low, positive-high） and ERP data showed that although with similar starts, they ended up with different patterns, which were distributed mainly over the anterior regions of the brain. In addition, the differences between false memory and true memory proved salient. Regarding behavioral data and eye movement data, participants took longer to respond to false memory compared to true memory, and also displayed a larger amount of both fixation duration and count. In conclusion, it was found that both emotional arousal and valence could promote false memory but arousal took effect at an earlier time. Moreover, the differences between false memory and true memory were illustrated at the neural level. More specific, false memory was processed more deeply than true memory at earlier time points, showing that false memory required deeper processing to recognize stimuli; this indicated the ＂unfamiliar＂ effect of false memory in eye movement. In addition, false memory was processed to a greater degree than true memory at later points, impling that false memory took a larger amount of mental processing（e.g., information searching and comparing） to complete a final decision-making. Logically, false memory and true memory proved distinct temporally： false memory compared to true memory took longer to finish its formation at earlier time points and then its recall at later points.