心理发展与教育
心理髮展與教育
심리발전여교육
Psychological Development and Education
2015年
2期
198~203
,共null页
干扰 熟悉度 场依存 场独立 语篇阅读
榦擾 熟悉度 場依存 場獨立 語篇閱讀
간우 숙실도 장의존 장독립 어편열독
interference; familiarity; field dependence; field independence; text reading
采用熟悉词和不熟悉词为干扰材料,考察了干扰材料的熟悉性对语篇阅读的影响。实验第一阶段要求不同认知方式被试朗读插入熟悉度不同干扰材料的短文,考查被试的阅读效率;第二阶段采用学习—自由回忆任务考查不同提示条件下在短文中使用过的干扰词和新词的学习效果。结果发现:(1)对场独立者而言,熟悉词的干扰作用明显大于不熟悉词,而对场依存者而言,熟悉词和不熟悉词的干扰作用无差异;(2)在提示条件下,被试对干扰词的回忆量大于对新词的回忆量。研究结果表明,在语篇阅读过程中,与场依存者相比,熟悉的干扰材料对场独立者的影响更大;熟悉词比不熟悉词产生更大干扰的原因可能是由于其激活了读者更多的经验,而非具有加工的优势。
採用熟悉詞和不熟悉詞為榦擾材料,攷察瞭榦擾材料的熟悉性對語篇閱讀的影響。實驗第一階段要求不同認知方式被試朗讀插入熟悉度不同榦擾材料的短文,攷查被試的閱讀效率;第二階段採用學習—自由迴憶任務攷查不同提示條件下在短文中使用過的榦擾詞和新詞的學習效果。結果髮現:(1)對場獨立者而言,熟悉詞的榦擾作用明顯大于不熟悉詞,而對場依存者而言,熟悉詞和不熟悉詞的榦擾作用無差異;(2)在提示條件下,被試對榦擾詞的迴憶量大于對新詞的迴憶量。研究結果錶明,在語篇閱讀過程中,與場依存者相比,熟悉的榦擾材料對場獨立者的影響更大;熟悉詞比不熟悉詞產生更大榦擾的原因可能是由于其激活瞭讀者更多的經驗,而非具有加工的優勢。
채용숙실사화불숙실사위간우재료,고찰료간우재료적숙실성대어편열독적영향。실험제일계단요구불동인지방식피시랑독삽입숙실도불동간우재료적단문,고사피시적열독효솔;제이계단채용학습—자유회억임무고사불동제시조건하재단문중사용과적간우사화신사적학습효과。결과발현:(1)대장독립자이언,숙실사적간우작용명현대우불숙실사,이대장의존자이언,숙실사화불숙실사적간우작용무차이;(2)재제시조건하,피시대간우사적회억량대우대신사적회억량。연구결과표명,재어편열독과정중,여장의존자상비,숙실적간우재료대장독립자적영향경대;숙실사비불숙실사산생경대간우적원인가능시유우기격활료독자경다적경험,이비구유가공적우세。
The present study explored how the familiarity of distractions and individual cognitive styles influenced text reading by using familiar and unfamiliar words. The study included two stages. In the first stage,participants with different cognitive styles read eight passages and then answered three questions. In the second stage,participants studied a list of 16 words for free recall,consisting of 8 previously familiar distracting words,8 new familiar words,or consisting of 8 previously unfamiliar distracting words,8 new unfamiliar words. Half of the participants were cued about the relevance of previous distractions and text reading before recalling the words in the memory test. The results are as follows: the influence of the familiar words was significantly higher than that of the unfamiliar words for field independent participants,while there were no significant differences for field dependent participants. Furthermore,the number of old words( previously distractions) recalled was significantly higher than that of new words in the cued memory task for both familiar and unfamiliar words. The results indicate that:( 1)compared to field dependent individuals,field independent individuals are more easily influenced by familiar distractions in text reading;( 2) familiar words could lead more significant interference than unfamiliar ones in reading,possibly due to the activation of individual experience rather than the processing priority of familiar words.