CAJ | 학술논문

刑法解释的立场指导着刑法解释的方向,是刑法解释的最基本问题。客观主义解释主张从＂法的本意＂来解释刑法,而主观主义立场主张从＂立法者原意＂来解释刑法。因此＂法的本意＂的来源、存在基础以及其解释效果是应当为各界所关注的。从认知规律看,立法者的立法过程和解释者的解释过程都离不开理性的认识,在质疑＂立法者原意＂理性的同时,也不能忽视解释者对于＂法的本意＂探讨的理性。从表意学角度出发,解读立法者的原意、立法者的表意和法律文本的文义之间的关系,立法者的原意是三者中核心和本质的部分,是表达的出发点和依据。在刑法解释过程中,解释对象和解释者之间的融合是解释的一种必然现象,但这绝不是解释的一种应然方法。从某种意义上讲,正是这种现象的存在才要采取一定的方法来制约。在摒弃＂立法者原意＂的情况下,客观主义解释的立场是主观化的,而主观主义解释的立场是客观化的。所以,在刑法解释中应该遵循主观主义解释立场。
형법해석적립장지도착형법해석적방향,시형법해석적최기본문제。객관주의해석주장종＂법적본의＂래해석형법,이주관주의립장주장종＂입법자원의＂래해석형법。인차＂법적본의＂적래원、존재기출이급기해석효과시응당위각계소관주적。종인지규률간,입법자적입법과정화해석자적해석과정도리불개이성적인식,재질의＂입법자원의＂이성적동시,야불능홀시해석자대우＂법적본의＂탐토적이성。종표의학각도출발,해독입법자적원의、입법자적표의화법률문본적문의지간적관계,입법자적원의시삼자중핵심화본질적부분,시표체적출발점화의거。재형법해석과정중,해석대상화해석자지간적융합시해석적일충필연현상,단저절불시해석적일충응연방법。종모충의의상강,정시저충현상적존재재요채취일정적방법래제약。재병기＂입법자원의＂적정황하,객관주의해석적립장시주관화적,이주관주의해석적립장시객관화적。소이,재형법해석중응해준순주관주의해석립장。
The position of criminal law interpretation guides the direction of interpretation of criminal law,which is the most basic problem. Although there are different positions,they are derived from a certain philosophical basis,epistemology,ideographic science and hermeneutics provide the multi-dimensional perspectives for interpretation of criminal law. From the epistemological point of view,the process of the legislators＇ legislation and the process of interpreters＇ interpretation cannot be separated from rational knowledge,and rational relativity not only embodied in legislators but also in the interpreters. From the point of ideographic science,to interpret the relationship between the original intent of the legislators,the expression of the legislators and legal texts,should be certain that the position of the original intent of the legislators,which is the core and essence of the three. The interpretation of criminal law itself belongs to the scope of hermeneutics,only because of its particularity,which causes the difference with the interpretation of the general philosophy in the meaning and requirements. The circulation of interpretation,fusion of horizons and the former viewpoints is the description of the phenomenon of the interpretation,recognition of the existence of the phenomenon does not mean it as a method to interpret,the ontology and methods must be distinguished.