安徽农业大学学报:社会科学版
安徽農業大學學報:社會科學版
안휘농업대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of Anhui Agricultural University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
2015年
2期
26~29
,共null页
环境公益诉讼 动力不足 对策
環境公益訴訟 動力不足 對策
배경공익소송 동력불족 대책
environmental public interest litigation; lacking of impetu; suggestions
在环境污染事件频发的背景下,我国对环境公益诉讼作出了一系列探索,但实施效果与当初预期还有相当差距,动力不足是重要表现之一。深层原因主要有法律制度不健全、法院受理公益诉讼案件保守、法官排斥环境公益诉讼案件、案件成本制约公益诉讼、公众参与沦为空话等。因此,必须从完善实体法、构建系统的环境诉讼程序机制、改革环保法庭体系设置、鼓励公众参与等方面提出对策建议,以健全公益诉讼基本理论作为推动力,将司法实践上的松绑作为混合动力,将公众参与作为根本和持久动力,构建完善的环境公益诉讼动力机制,摆脱环境公益诉讼动力不足的局面。
在環境汙染事件頻髮的揹景下,我國對環境公益訴訟作齣瞭一繫列探索,但實施效果與噹初預期還有相噹差距,動力不足是重要錶現之一。深層原因主要有法律製度不健全、法院受理公益訴訟案件保守、法官排斥環境公益訴訟案件、案件成本製約公益訴訟、公衆參與淪為空話等。因此,必鬚從完善實體法、構建繫統的環境訴訟程序機製、改革環保法庭體繫設置、鼓勵公衆參與等方麵提齣對策建議,以健全公益訴訟基本理論作為推動力,將司法實踐上的鬆綁作為混閤動力,將公衆參與作為根本和持久動力,構建完善的環境公益訴訟動力機製,襬脫環境公益訴訟動力不足的跼麵。
재배경오염사건빈발적배경하,아국대배경공익소송작출료일계렬탐색,단실시효과여당초예기환유상당차거,동력불족시중요표현지일。심층원인주요유법률제도불건전、법원수리공익소송안건보수、법관배척배경공익소송안건、안건성본제약공익소송、공음삼여륜위공화등。인차,필수종완선실체법、구건계통적배경소송정서궤제、개혁배보법정체계설치、고려공음삼여등방면제출대책건의,이건전공익소송기본이론작위추동력,장사법실천상적송방작위혼합동력,장공음삼여작위근본화지구동력,구건완선적배경공익소송동력궤제,파탈배경공익소송동력불족적국면。
Under the background of frequently-occurred environmental pollution, China has made a series ot researches on environmental public interest litigation. However, there is still a considerable gap between the implementation effect and the expected result, lacking of impetus being one of the important manifestations. The underlying reasons are listed as follows: the legal system is not perfect; the court is reluctant to accept the public interest litigation cases; judges dislike such cases; the cost limits the litigation; and public participation becomes empty words. Thus, we must put forward countermeasures and suggestions from the following aspects, such as, complementing the substantial law of environmental public interest litigation, setting up a systematic procedure mechanism of environmental public interest litigation, reforming the system setup of environmental courts and tribunals and encouraging the public participation. Moreover, we should regard improving the basic theory of the public interest litigation as driving force, take the easing of judicial practice as hybrid power, and consider the public participation as fundamental force, so as to establish a systematic environment public litigation dynamic mechanism and get out of the impetus-lacking predicament.