CAJ | 학술논문

因科学争论为科学社会学、科学知识社会学（SSK）及科技与社会研究提供了观察社会因素如何影响科学进程的独特视角和素材，这一领域得到了科技研究领域学者的广泛研究，SSK学者更是通过争议研究奠定了影响深远的科学的社会建构理论。学界对科学争议研究多有介绍与梳理，但既往述评忽视了经典科学社会学、SSK以及探究科技争议的社会政治影响这三种主要的争议研究路线的差异与联系，也未系统分析科学的社会特性对不同类型争议的影响。本研究以考察科学争议的社会性为线索，分析对比了上述三种研究路线，并探讨了SSK学者所倡导的科学的社会建构在分析公共科学争端时的局限性。
인과학쟁론위과학사회학、과학지식사회학（SSK）급과기여사회연구제공료관찰사회인소여하영향과학진정적독특시각화소재，저일영역득도료과기연구영역학자적엄범연구，SSK학자경시통과쟁의연구전정료영향심원적과학적사회건구이론。학계대과학쟁의연구다유개소여소리，단기왕술평홀시료경전과학사회학、SSK이급탐구과기쟁의적사회정치영향저삼충주요적쟁의연구로선적차이여련계，야미계통분석과학적사회특성대불동류형쟁의적영향。본연구이고찰과학쟁의적사회성위선색，분석대비료상술삼충연구로선，병탐토료SSK학자소창도적과학적사회건구재분석공공과학쟁단시적국한성。
Due to their provision of a specific version for scholars to observe how social factors impact scientific process, science and technology （S＆T） controversies have long been highlighted among research in Mertonian sociology of science, sociology of scientific knowledge （SSK） and science, technology ＆ society （STS）. And based on the studies of controversies, SSK scholars established the far-reaching theory of social construction of science. But previous research have neglectedthe differences and links between controversy studies in sociology of science, SSK and STS. Neither has they systematically explored the impact of social characteristics of science on different types of S＆T controversies. Based on the clue of investigating the soeiality of scientific eontroversy, this paper makes a comparison between the three research routes, and discusses the limitations of the social construction of science theory in analyzing public scientific controversy.