CAJ | 학술논문

当前学界对于司法确认性质的探讨和争论主要围绕着是诉讼程序还是非讼程序展开，而依据基本都是“二元分离适用论”下的“实质界限说”为判断标准。但实际上，对于诉讼与非讼的界分，理论界早已用“交错适用论”代替了“二元分离适用论”。因此，以“交错适用论”为基础来判断，司法确认由于具有非讼争性、解决纠纷的目的性以及程序保障的适中性，应该属于诉讼法理与非讼法理交错适用的民事案件，将其纳入到诉讼程序或非讼程序均可，关键看立法政策如何取舍。而从制度设计的本意考量，将司法确认程序纳入到非讼程序应该说更为适宜，因为非讼程序相比于诉讼程序所具有的快捷、迅速、经济及弹性的特点，与司法确认程序所要实现的制度目标更为接近。
당전학계대우사법학인성질적탐토화쟁론주요위요착시소송정서환시비송정서전개，이의거기본도시“이원분리괄용론”하적“실질계한설”위판단표준。단실제상，대우소송여비송적계분，이론계조이용“교착괄용론”대체료“이원분리괄용론”。인차，이“교착괄용론”위기출래판단，사법학인유우구유비송쟁성、해결규분적목적성이급정서보장적괄중성，응해속우소송법리여비송법리교착괄용적민사안건，장기납입도소송정서혹비송정서균가，관건간입법정책여하취사。이종제도설계적본의고량，장사법학인정서납입도비송정서응해설경위괄의，인위비송정서상비우소송정서소구유적쾌첩、신속、경제급탄성적특점，여사법학인정서소요실현적제도목표경위접근。
Based on the absolute distinction between judicial procedure and non-judicial procedure, theoretical discussions focus on the nature of judicial confirmation as to whether the judicial confirmation is judicial procedure or not, and its purpose is to prevent or resolve a dispute. Theoretically, the differentiation between judicial procedure and non-judicial procedure is vanishing gradually. Thus in my opinion, the nature of judicial confirmation is a complex of judicial procedure and non-judicial procedure. In order to design a perfect institute, classifying it as non-judicial procedure is more appropriate, because non-judicial procedure is more flexible, convenient and efficient than judicial procedure, and is beneficial to achieve its purpose.