CAJ | 학술논문

目前对输血感染侵权归责原则的讨论大多局限在法律技术层面,即通过对＂产品＂概念的内涵及外延的探讨,分析输血感染责任是否属于产品责任范畴,从而实现对相应侵权归责原则的论证。然而即使承认血液及血液衍生品是产品,血站和医院仍可依据＂发展风险抗辩＂而免于承担无过错责任。决定输血感染侵权归责原则的关键应当是：如何在现有法律框架内,通过对输血感染风险的合理分配,实现相应的社会政策目标。根据我国现有国情,对输血感染适用无过错责任更符合相应政策目标,且能够与现行侵权责任法体系平滑衔接。
목전대수혈감염침권귀책원칙적토론대다국한재법률기술층면,즉통과대＂산품＂개념적내함급외연적탐토,분석수혈감염책임시부속우산품책임범주,종이실현대상응침권귀책원칙적론증。연이즉사승인혈액급혈액연생품시산품,혈참화의원잉가의거＂발전풍험항변＂이면우승담무과착책임。결정수혈감염침권귀책원칙적관건응당시：여하재현유법률광가내,통과대수혈감염풍험적합리분배,실현상응적사회정책목표。근거아국현유국정,대수혈감염괄용무과착책임경부합상응정책목표,차능구여현행침권책임법체계평활함접。
The discussions on the tort liability principle of blood transfusion infection mainly focus on the legal dimension concerning the denotation and connotation of the product to analyze whether or not the blood transfusion infection should be attributed to the product. However,even blood and blood derivatives are considered as products,the blood station and hospital could still be free from the non- fault liability according to the ＂ development of risk defense＂. According to our present situation,the application of non-fault liability to blood transfusion infection can better conform to the corresponding goals of our policy,and can smoothly engage with the legal system of the tort liability.