哈尔滨工业大学学报:社会科学版
哈爾濱工業大學學報:社會科學版
합이빈공업대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
2015年
2期
39~43
,共null页
司法鉴定 鉴定意见 合理性审查标准
司法鑒定 鑒定意見 閤理性審查標準
사법감정 감정의견 합이성심사표준
judicial authentication; authentication opinions; review standards of rationality
真正能让法官对司法鉴定意见产生内心确信的标准是其"合理性",即合乎事实、合乎理性、合乎规律与合乎逻辑。因此,"合理性"才是司法鉴定意见的实体审查标准,是司法鉴定意见最具价值的因素。以"合理性"为标准,有利于法官对鉴定意见进行准确认证、提高鉴定文书的质量、提升司法公信力。违背现有鉴定规范和技术标准的鉴定意见、明显违背经验法则的鉴定意见以及没有依据支撑的鉴定意见,都不符合"合理性"标准。应该完善司法鉴定标准立法,加强司法鉴定人才队伍建设,提升司法鉴定能力,规范鉴定意见审查认证过程中的法官自由裁量权,以此完善司法鉴定实体审查的制度建构。
真正能讓法官對司法鑒定意見產生內心確信的標準是其"閤理性",即閤乎事實、閤乎理性、閤乎規律與閤乎邏輯。因此,"閤理性"纔是司法鑒定意見的實體審查標準,是司法鑒定意見最具價值的因素。以"閤理性"為標準,有利于法官對鑒定意見進行準確認證、提高鑒定文書的質量、提升司法公信力。違揹現有鑒定規範和技術標準的鑒定意見、明顯違揹經驗法則的鑒定意見以及沒有依據支撐的鑒定意見,都不符閤"閤理性"標準。應該完善司法鑒定標準立法,加彊司法鑒定人纔隊伍建設,提升司法鑒定能力,規範鑒定意見審查認證過程中的法官自由裁量權,以此完善司法鑒定實體審查的製度建構。
진정능양법관대사법감정의견산생내심학신적표준시기"합이성",즉합호사실、합호이성、합호규률여합호라집。인차,"합이성"재시사법감정의견적실체심사표준,시사법감정의견최구개치적인소。이"합이성"위표준,유리우법관대감정의견진행준학인증、제고감정문서적질량、제승사법공신력。위배현유감정규범화기술표준적감정의견、명현위배경험법칙적감정의견이급몰유의거지탱적감정의견,도불부합"합이성"표준。응해완선사법감정표준입법,가강사법감정인재대오건설,제승사법감정능력,규범감정의견심사인증과정중적법관자유재량권,이차완선사법감정실체심사적제도건구。
The inner standard for judicial authentication opinions that really convinced judges is the"rationality",namely to be in line with facts,rational,and logical.As a result,the rationality is the substantial examination standards of judicial authentication opinions,the most valuable factor in judicial authentication opinions.The standard of"rationality"is helpful for judges to evaluate authentication opinions accurately,to improve the quality of identification documents,and to promote the judicial credibility.The judicial authentication opinions which are against the existing appraisal regulations and technical standards,those which obviously violate the rule of thumb,and those which are not in accordance with the appraisal opinions,do not conform to the standard of"rationality".Legislation should perfect the judicial authentication standard,strengthen the talent team of judicial authentication,improve the capacity of judicial authentication and regulate the judge discretion in the process of review and certification of expert opinion,so as to perfect the system of judicial identification of physical examination.